Saturday, June 28, 2008

news on John Oates [of hall and oates] and his mustache......

Musician Oates shape-shifting as cartoon alter-ego
Reuters - USA
... portray Oates as a modern-day family man who finds himself enticed back to the rock-star life by his mustache, which is voiced by comedian Dave Attell. ...
See all stories on this topic

Oates Loses Hall, Gains Moustache, New Cartoon and Extra Hipster...
Dose.ca - Toronto,Ontario,Canada
(He may be voiced by Dave Attell, but there's no way the 'stache could sing "Out of Touch" like you.) According to teasers, this sass-talking 'stache tries ...
See all stories on this topic

THUD: THE BEST GODDAMN STORY YOU'LL READ ALL DAY
Cinematic Happenings Under Development - New York,NY,USA
Dave Attell will voice the 'stache. Suddenly, a dying David Crosby appears and with his last breath warns Oates of a mysterious secret group of mustache ...
See all stories on this topic

Oates, Mustache Make Cartoon Crime-Fighting Team
Billboard - New York,NY,USA
... is portrayed as a modern-day family man and finds himself enticed back to the rock star life by his mustache, which is voiced by comedian Dave Attell. ...
See all stories on this topic

Google Blogs Alert for: Dave Attell

John Oates' mustache will be voiced by Dave Attell
By Yatsushiro Radio(Yatsushiro Radio)
More proof that my horrific version of reality is far cooler than most of yours.
Yatsushiro Radio - http://yatsrad.blogspot.com/

...Dave Attell as the 'stache
By jerseydevil
I am so there!!!!! THUD: THE BEST GODDAMN STORY YOU'LL READ ALL DAY.
Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum - http://www.letsgokings.com/bbs

Instant Vox Pop
By Cathy Maestri
In the pilot, the mustache will be voiced by Dave Attell. Seriously. •It would appear that a Phish reunion (or at least a decent party) is in the works. Here's the statement from Page McConnell on the band's web site: ...
Riverside CA Inland Empire News... - http://www.instantriverside.com

John Oates' Mustache is Getting its Own TV Show
By Jeff Kirby
As laid out in a two-minute trailer, Oates is portrayed as a modern-day family man and finds himself enticed back to the rock star life by his mustache, which is voiced by comedian Dave Attell. "In a cartoon setting, the mustache has ...
Line Out - http://lineout.thestranger.com/

His bark is much worse than his bi-ite
"Oates is portrayed as a modern-day family man and finds himself enticed back to the rock star life by his mustache, which is voiced by comedian Dave Attell." Um, thanks, Don.
Coudal Partners Blended Feed - http://www.coudal.com/



Friday, June 27, 2008

America’s Aviation System Could Be at Risk of Collapsing by the Beginning of...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via cryptogon.com by Kevin on 6/26/08

Via: Christian Science Monitor: America's aviation system could be at risk of collapsing by the beginning of next year. That warning from aviation experts has prompted some industry leaders to call for re-regulation, something considered almost heresy until now. Others are urging Washington to do more to rein in the oil speculators pushing up fuel costs. But there [...]

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

ATF Raids Blackwater Armory, Seizes Automatic Weapons



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via cryptogon.com by Kevin on 6/27/08

Via: AP: Federal agents have raided an armory owned by security contractor Blackwater Worldwide. The North Carolina-based company said the raid was part of an investigation into a deal that allowed a local sheriff's office to store high-powered assault rifles at the company's armory at its headquarters in Moyock. Blackwater spokeswoman Anne Tyrrell says that investigators with the [...]

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

U.S. Government Seizing Laptops and Cameras Without Cause



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via cryptogon.com by Kevin on 6/27/08

I've posted about this several times, but the practice is so abhorrent that it's worth monitoring. Via: U.S. News and World Report: Returning from a brief vacation to Germany in February, Bill Hogan was selected for additional screening by customs officials at Dulles International Airport outside Washington, D.C. Agents searched Hogan's luggage and then popped an unexpected [...]

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Barclays Warns of a Financial Storm as Federal Reserve’s Credibility Crumbles



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via cryptogon.com by Kevin on 6/27/08

Via: Telegraph: Barclays Capital has advised clients to batten down the hatches for a worldwide financial storm, warning that the US Federal Reserve has allowed the inflation genie out of the bottle and let its credibility fall "below zero". "We're in a nasty environment," said Tim Bond, the bank's chief equity strategist. "There is an inflation shock [...]

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

iPhone roundup: iTunes remote, Apple ready for real software in the App Store



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Engadget by Chris Ziegler on 6/26/08

Filed under: ,

Who would've thought that rumored iControl app would not only turn out to be real, but survive the inevitable internal politics, delays, and feature cutbacks to make it all the way through to a summer release? Sure enough, iTunes 7.7 has been pushed out to developers in the past several hours, and the installer encourages iPhone and iPod touch owners to "use the new Remote application for iPhone or iPod touch to control iTunes playback from anywhere in your home -- a free download from the App Store." No further details are given -- and it's not clear whether the "iControl" name seen earlier has been scrapped altogether -- but we can guess that it'll use WiFi to hook up with your mainframe, which really makes the idea of an AirPort Express appealing all over again.

On another note, Apple has released Beta 8 of the iPhone SDK and is using the occasion to kick off acceptances of applications to the real, live App Store in preparation for its July 11 launch. It appears that Beta 8 is actually required to complete the process, so don't go jumping the gun now -- goodness knows the rest of the iPhone-toting world doesn't want your half-baked apps in a couple weeks, you shady developer, you.

Read - iPhone / iTunes Remote app
Read - Applications to App Store now being accepted
Permalink | Email this | Comments


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

JJ Abrams’ Enterprise Feels Fully Functional



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via /Film by orfilms@gmail.com (slashfilm.com) on 6/26/08

Harry Knowles got the chance to see some early footage from JJ Abrams' Star Trek. The few short clips he saw were early edits without proper cg or color timing. The one bit I found particularly interesting is the first description of the bridge of the USS Enterprise:

"For the first time in the history of Star Trek, [the bridge] looked amazingly functional. It echoes that classic Trek look – but imagine if you handed that design to the folks at APPLE and said… Make it really work. I instantly believed in the functionality of everything. That's hard to quantify, but it is true. Remember when you saw the war room underground on Hoth in EMPIRE STRIKES BACK? How it just felt functional – that's what this looked. And it looked Star Trek, without looking as cheap as Star Trek. It was a tech-fetishists wet dream."

You can read Harry's full report on AICN.

Related Stories:


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Dark Knight Midnight Shows Are Selling Out



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via /Film by orfilms@gmail.com (slashfilm.com) on 6/26/08

WOW. Fandango is reporting that dozens of showtimes for The Dark Knight are already sold out for the midnight screenings on Thursday night/Friday morning, July 17th. That's right, even with a full three weeks before the film hits, screenings have begun to sell out. A few theaters have begun to add 3:00am showtimes on Friday morning to help meet the consumer demand.

Related Stories:


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

The Fight To End Aging Gains Legitimacy, Funding



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Slashdot by timothy on 6/26/08

oddwick11 writes "Aubrey de Grey and other leading scientists and thinkers in stem cell research and regenerative medicine will gather in Los Angeles at UCLA for Aging 2008 to explain how their work can combat human aging, and the sociological implications of developing rejuvenation therapies. From an article today in WIRED Magazine 'Now, though, some scientists are beginning to view his approach — looking at aging as a disease and bringing in more disciplines into gerontology — as worthwhile, even if they still look askance at his claims of permanent reversible aging within a lifespan. The Methuselah Foundation now has an annual research funding budget of several million dollars, de Grey says, and it's beginning to show lab results that he thinks will turn scientists' heads.'" The conference is free, though registration is required; L.A. area readers who can attend are encouraged to post their thoughts. Update: 06/27 05:18 GMT by T : Dr. de Grey notes that you can also simply show up and register on-site. Look forward to a Slashdot interview with de Grey in the near future.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, June 26, 2008

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Dubai plans 'moving' skyscraper

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Dubai plans 'moving' skyscraper: "The world's first moving building, an 80-storey tower with revolving floors giving a shifting shape, will be built in Dubai, its architect says.

The Dynamic Tower design is made up of 80 pre-fabricated apartments which will spin independently of one another.

'It's the first building that rotates, moves, and changes shape,' said architect David Fisher, who is Italian, at a news conference in New York.

'This building never looks the same, not once in a lifetime,' he added"

The Existentialist Cowboy: The Un-American Lies of Antonin Scalia

The Existentialist Cowboy: The Un-American Lies of Antonin Scalia: "It's time the American people fired the man who thinks himself 'too smart for the (Supreme) court'. Scalia has done it again. The architect of Bush v Gore, the disingenuous decision that stuck us with Bush, has stooped to yet another low. Scalia will tell bald faced lies to prop up his bullshit 'opinions'.

To bolster his argument that the Guantanamo detainees should be denied the right to prove their innocence in federal courts, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissent in Boumediene v. Bush: 'At least 30 of those prisoners hitherto released from Guantanamo have returned to the battlefield.' It turns out that statement is false.

According to a new report by Seton Hall Law Center for Policy and Research, 'The statistic was endorsed by a Senate Minority Report issued June 26, 2007, which cites a media outlet, CNN. CNN, in turn, named the DoD as its source. The '30' number, however, was corrected in a DoD press release issued in July 2007, and a DoD document submitted to the House Foreign Relations Committee on May 20, 2008 abandons the claim entirely.'

--Scalia Cites False Information in Habeas Corpus Dissent"

House Votes to Expand Civil Rights for Disabled - NYTimes.com

House Votes to Expand Civil Rights for Disabled - NYTimes.com: "The House passed a major civil rights bill on Wednesday that would expand protections for people with disabilities and overturn several Supreme Court decisions issued in the last decade.

The bill, approved 402 to 17, would make it easier for workers to prove discrimination. It would explicitly relax some stringent standards set by the court and says that disability is to be “construed broadly,” to cover more physical and mental impairments.

Supporters of the proposal said it would restore the broad protections that Congress meant to establish when it passed the Americans With Disabilities Act that President George Bush signed in 1990."

Gun-Control Supporters Show Outrage - NYTimes.com

Gun-Control Supporters Show Outrage - NYTimes.com: "In Chicago, Mayor Richard M. Daley, a staunch supporter of gun control, called the decision “frightening” and said he was bracing for a fight with the gun lobby, which has long criticized the city’s ban on the sale and registration of handguns for everyone but police officers and a handful of others. Enacted in 1982, the law was created in response to the murders of two police officers and the assassination attempt on former president Ronald Reagan.

“Does this lead to everyone having a gun in our society?” he said at a news conference. “If they think that’s the answer, then they’re greatly mistaken. Then, why don’t we do away with the court system and go back to the Old West? You have a gun and I have a gun and we’ll settle in the streets.

“They’re changing the rules,” Mr. Daley said of the Supreme Court. “Why should we as a city not be able to protect ourselves from those who want guns in our society?”"

Gun-Control Supporters Show Outrage - NYTimes.com

Gun-Control Supporters Show Outrage - NYTimes.com: "Gun-control advocates across the country reacted with shock and outrage at the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns today, saying the ruling would threaten gun-control measures in other states.

If there was any doubt that other bans would be in peril, the National Rifle Association quickly put those questions to rest when it announced shortly after the ruling that it would file a flurry of lawsuits challenging restrictions in San Francisco, Chicago and several Chicago suburbs. The law in Washington, which spelled out rules for the storage of weapons and made it extremely difficult for most people in the district to legally possess a handgun, was among the strictest in the nation."

John McCain's character shows through by not forcing Charlie Black to resign | BuzzFlash.org

John McCain's character shows through by not forcing Charlie Black to resign | BuzzFlash.org: "Richard Clarke was on Countdown with Keith Olbermann calling for the resignation of Black from the McCain campaign. 'Charlie Black ought to be gone tomorrow morning.'

It says a lot about the McCain campaign that he hasn't called upon Black to resign, and it says quite a bit about Black in that he didn't voluntarily offer to resign.

The 'monster' comment obviously wasn't very nice, but doesn't even come close to the horrible things Black has said about the Bhutto assassination and any potential terrorism threats."

Bush Administration kowtows to NRA, proposes allowing loaded firearms in national parks | BuzzFlash.org

Bush Administration kowtows to NRA, proposes allowing loaded firearms in national parks | BuzzFlash.org: "The Bush Administration proposed a repeal of the current law governing firearms in national parks in favor of new regulations that would allow for people to carry loaded, concealed weapons into the parks. This move would increase poaching in the parks, according to the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

PEER released a statement Thursday arguing against the proposed change for its failure to consider environmental concerns. The organization blamed the proposal on the influence of the National Rifle Association (NRA)."

BBC NEWS | Americas | US court overturns DC handgun ban

BBC NEWS | Americas | US court overturns DC handgun ban: "A ban on handguns in Washington DC has been ruled unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 decision, the justices upheld a lower court ruling striking down the ban. They said individuals had a right to keep handguns for lawful purposes."

Conservative Government Destroys Atlanta Like Gen. Sherman Never Could

AlterNet

Conservative Government Destroys Atlanta Like Gen. Sherman Never Could

By Rick Perlstein, Blog for Our Future
Posted on June 23, 2008, Printed on June 26, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/89018/

Most our media have been far too busy following the news of what kind of fist bumps terrorists favor, and Luke Russert's exceptional poise under pressure, to notice -- well, much of anything. Least of all, the Biblically proportioned drought in one of our nation's fastest growing regions, which is only getting worse, and more civilizationally consequential, by the day.

Atlanta magazine could no longer ignore it. The cover of their "The Water Issue," which I picked up on a recent swing thorugh Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, is graced by a water glass that's one-quarter full -- scratch that, three-quarters empty. The entire magazine is a fascinating document, a potsherd for future archeologists seeking answers to the kind of neuroses that allowed a civilization let itself be run according to an ideology -- conservatism -- so singularly unfit to govern a complex, modern society. Amidst all the schmancy department store and Cartier watch ads, the columns on "Scent marketing" ("among Advertising Age's top ten trends to watch in 2007") and enticements to purchase property at marquee destinations like The Inn At Palmetto Bluff ("50 beautifully appointed waterfront cottages, full-service spa, inspired Lowcountry, cuisine, exlusive Jack Nicklaus Signature golf course...") -- the landscaping ad featuring the gushing backyard waterfall alongside the furnished stone gazebo was an especially decadent touch, directly across fro a full page ad for "Brookhaven Retreat, treating both addiction and mental health challenges" -- these 176 pages document a narcissistic metropolis on the verge of a nervous breakdown, but not quite able to admit it.

In a letter to subscribers, the editor describes what it was like growing up in the Third World, as a child of missionaries: "In one of the places we stayed, water was piped in only one hour a day -- we had to run around with buckets and pots to catch every drop. in another, water that collected in rooftop tanks would turn scalding int he midday tropical heat. No matter where we traveled, flush toilets were a rarity." That's what she's been thinking of, walking into all the Atlanta bathrooms with "empty buckets near the tub": Atlantans, you see, have begun flushing their toilets with recycled bath water.

The fashion shoot, lithesome models swaddled in this summer's "bright colors and bold lines," is apocalyptically staged in an empty swimming pool. Equally apocalyptic is the comic-book style feature about Atlanta ca. 2050 as a civilization straight out of Soylent Green ("Inevitably, water thieves find a way to get around the system, but penalties are draconian. The water corps has the legal authority to SHOOT TO KILL"). The accompanying features on what happened and why are exemplary -- save for the absence of one concept Atlanta (which on page 26 endorses, tongue only half in cheek, libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr) can't quite bring itself to utter: conservatism.

One phrase they do manage to use: states rights. Portentously, in 1990, Governor Hunt of Alabama, joined by the governor of Florida, sued Georgia, "with its endless development" and "unquenchable thirst for water," to keep the Army Corps of Engineer from sharing "their" water resources. All told over the entire United States, the Army Corps of Engineers built and runs 464 lakes in 43 states, one of them Atlatna's life-giving Lake Lanier; but the notion of the federal government actually coordinating all these resources for the common good would just be too, too un-American to contemplate. Instead, this civil war has ratcheted up to Israel-Palestine levels. "In March, U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kepthorne finally put the bickering governors in a collective time-out after they missed a deadline to come up with a tri-state agreement." There hasn't been any agreement yet. Southerners are a prideful pack, after all, loath to take dictation from pointy-headed bureaucrats in Washington.

States rights: that fetish of generations of Southern politicians desperate for a rhetorically innocent way to institutionalize their rage at federal demands for equal racial justice. It has come back now to bite Dixie rather soundly in the ass. Actually, the ideology is more pathological than mere states rights: the zero-sum war of all against all has descended to the level of the localities, with Augusta's blessing. "To Perdue, water is a local issue. 'The state can be there to help...but we should not be in the business of directing and instructing communities on how to do their business," [press secretary Bert] Brantley says.... Last year, Alabama went to court to stop the city of Canton and the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority's (CCMWA) construction of the Hickory Log Creek Reservoir in Cherokee County -- four weeks shy of the dam's projected completion." One of the package's articles narrates the Hatfield-and-McCoy-like feud between the counties of Douglas and Cobb, when an administrator in the former had the forsight to plan for a possible drought, building a new reservoir, banning outdoor watering -- only to see the Cobb connive in the state legislature, like Daniel Day Lewis in There Will Be Blood, to siphon off Douglas's suddenly flush water resources.

Missed opportunity after missed opportunity are adumbrated therein. Yet the magazine blames not ideology but "bureaucracy." That's all right for our purposes, because the ideology hides in plain sight. Atlanta boomed in the wake of the monster capital investments made in anticipation of the 1996 Olympics, the magazine reports; "In 1990, the Atlanta area was projected to draw 800,000 new residents over the next twenty years; in the ten years following the Olympics, the total population increased by almost 1.4 million.... But in that same ten-year period, the reservoirs that supply our most vital resource grew not a bit."

Nobody could have anticipated the breach in the infrastructure: "In 1969, a study by the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission...determined that significant infrastructure changes would be required to avoid critical water shortages when the metro area's population soared to between 3 million (reached in 1993) an 5 million (2006). In the 1980s, water planners mapped out a proposed network of reservoirs throughout North Georgia to shore up water for inevitable droughts. Yet the reservoirs never got off paper. By the nineties, the projects were not only deemed to costly to pursue once rainfall returned in abundance, but they also threatened to further antagonize Alabama and Florida in the tri-state water dispute." What did the Atlanta metropolitan area do instead? Issue building permits -- 48,262 in 1996; 68,240 in 2006. That's the free-market way. The conservative way.

"The drought of 2002 was another wake up call, and then-Govenror Roy Barnes said 2003 would be the 'Year of Water.' Would his plan to build reservoirs and aid municipalities in fixing leaks have worked? No one knows. That year's gubernatorial election came down to Confederate stripes on the state flag."

Like I said, the magazine tells this story well, as far as it goe; but again, what Atlanta magazine can't bring itself to probe is the reason for the season -- the ideology that made it all possible, even inevitable. [Why no planning? Why no commitment of resources? Why did politics in Georgia at the most crucial possible juncture come down to the images on a flag? "Eighteen years, fourteen governors, and endless posturing and finger-pointing" brought on his "tri-state water war," we learn; what we don't learn is that Roy Barnes, the guy who actually stuck his neck out to solve the problem, was a Democrat, and the man who replaced him was the Confederate Flag-baiting Republican; and that besides Barnes, eight of these eleven governors were Republicans; and that the remaining three Democrats were either conservatives or hobbled in whatever enlightened reforms they might have proposed by conservative and/or Republican legislatures. That when Roy Barnes was governor, 61 of Georgia's state legislators, about a quarter -- Georgian readers, help me out: is that enough to stymie a tax reform in your state? -- signed Grover Norquist's pledge never, ever to support a tax increase, no matter what civilizational collapse might befall the Peachtree State as a consequence (the numbers are now 34 percent of Georgian senators and 30 percent of Georgian house members). And that, by the time the Olympics might have inspired them to reasonably call on the nation's collective coffers to shore up their infrastructure the House was being run by Cobb County's own anti-public investment zealot, Plank Seven of whose "Contract With America" demanded a three-fifths congressional majority to pass any tax increase, and "A balanced budget/tax limitation amendment and a legislative line-item veto to restore fiscal responsibility to an out-of-control congress." Who promptly shut down the federal government when he didn't get his budgetary way. Newt Gingrich used to love to talk about saving "civilization." Well, Newt: thanks to you and your boys, in Atlanta, we are beginning to see how civilizations begin to die.

Can you imagine having to go back in time to 1969 -- the year before the Nixon Administration bid for permanent conservative allegiance from Georgia by sending Vice President Agnew to dedicate a Confederate Memorial (the Atlanta Constitution was insulted when Kent State kept President Nixon himself from keeping the appointment -- and trying to explain to the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission's planners that their Confederacy-addled conservative state elites would prove so feckless as to utterly ignore their urgent, wise counsel? To do, simply, nothing but nothing?

Nobody could have anticipated the breach in the infrastructure

Metaphors of babies and bath water, bathtubs not even full enough to drown a government in (we have to save the water to make the toilets work), a dynamic regional economy spiraling down a drain proliferate at my fingertips, all too cheaply. They'll keep proliferating, in Atlanta and everywhere, until we defeat conservatism, and economic individualism, and "free market" madness," as "governing" philosophies.

Atlanta magazine can't make itself understand this; such are the powers that be, the broken right-wing culture within which it aspires to civic leadership, and in which it is, ultimately, complicit. The package's tone will be familiar to any student of the city's history. It is the cry of the "enlightened" business-boosterism class against the bubbas at the State Capitol in Augusta who cramp downtown's mojo with their silly wingnut ways: "Last fall, Sonny Perdue prayed publicly for rain. In February, he gave the okay for area pools to open -- an interesting and perhaps foolhardy decision given that Lake Lanier at the time was only two feet above its lowest level ever and adequate summer rainfall is unlikely." Perforce, the editors can't quite bring themselves to implicate the region's ür-Booster Business, Coca-Cola: did you know that the bottled water branded by Coke as "Dasani" ("Purified water enhanded with minerals for a pure, fresh taste") is actually pumped from Atlanta's municipal water supply (and is chemically indistinguishable from it); that Coke's flagship plant's monthly water bill from the city is only $27,000; but that, not to fearthe plant is working stalwartly to cut its water consumption by ten percent, and doesn't use as much water as the nearby chicken-processing plants, and has pledged to "replace every drop of water used in its beverages and their production"?

Apparently they're only replacing it in America. To its credit, Atlanta magazine points out the moral evasions in such claims: the "offsetting" is happening "in places such as India, where in the last few years more than fifty communities have complained of water shortages due to nearby Dasani bottling." In the end Atlanta magazine is far too busy to hate Coca-Cola Inc. The market made them do it: "In a way, though, we may all be to blame for how much of our water Coca-Cola is bottling and selling right back to us. It's a simple matter of supply and demand. Look around -- at the food court, at the ALTA match, at the Dogwood Festival, even here in Atlanta magazine's vending machines. It's perhaps pointless to build a case for Coca-Cola rethinking its Dasani production in a time of drought when we're the ones swallowing, literally, the idea that we can't live without the bottle."

And for all their mockery of crazy old Governor Perdue and his misplaced affection for swimming pools, they do coo sympathetically of his new allowance for the hand-watering of lawns "to alleviate the $2 billion-plus [sic!] hit the local landscaping industry took last year because of the draught."

Those poor, poor landscapers. But no worries: another feature in the package, "Ripple Effect," reminds Atlantans that there's money to be made in them thar empty reservoirs; "In the economics of water, some win and some lose." The landscape and timber businesses gets downward arrows, but things are looking up, no joke, for "rain barrel merchants," "rain recyclers," "roofers, "arborists," "car warshers" (at-home car washing has been banned), "stump grinders" and, yes, "golfers": "When a golf ball lands on hard, dry ground, you can get an extra thirty to forty yards off the tee with the bounce. Sweet!"

Rick Perlstein is the author of "Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fall of the American Consensus" (Scribner, 2008). Read more at Rick Perlstein's site.

© 2008 Blog for Our Future All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/89018/

t r u t h o u t | Living on the Ice Shelf: Humanity's Melt Down

t r u t h o u t | Living on the Ice Shelf: Humanity's Melt Down: "To the question 'Are we now living in the Anthropocene?' the 21 members of the Commission unanimously answer 'yes.' They adduce robust evidence that the Holocene epoch -- the interglacial span of unusually stable climate that has allowed the rapid evolution of agriculture and urban civilization -- has ended and that the Earth has entered 'a stratigraphic interval without close parallel in the last several million years.' In addition to the buildup of greenhouse gases, the stratigraphers cite human landscape transformation which 'now exceeds [annual] natural sediment production by an order of magnitude,' the ominous acidification of the oceans, and the relentless destruction of biota.

This new age, they explain, is defined both by the heating trend (whose closest analogue may be the catastrophe known as the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum, 56 million years ago) and by the radical instability expected of future environments. In somber prose, they warn that 'the combination of extinctions, global species migrations and the widespread replacement of natural vegetation with agricultural monocultures is producing a distinctive contemporary biostratigraphic signal. These effects are permanent, as future evolution will take place from surviving (and frequently anthropogenically relocated) stocks.' Evolution itself, in other wor"

Artie’s Dana is Dating



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


Artie found out that Dana is dating someone that the show knows. Artie lost it and started drinking Johnny Walker [while he was on antibiotics]. Howard said he thought Artie was still in love with her and started prodding him by joking "we can get her back". Artie acknowledged he probably is.

Poontang can really fuck up a man's head and heart. Even with the several chicks Artie is banging at the moment, he still isn't sure he is over Dana.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

“WE WENT TO WAR FOR THE OIL COMPANIES” Kucinich Tells Congress



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


Demands Bush Administration and Oil Company Execs be Held Accountable

Washington, DC (June 26, 2008)-- US Representative Dennis J. Kucinich, in a speech to the House of Representatives today, tied the secret meetings of the Cheney Energy Task Force to the recent award of non-competitive oil contracts in Iraq and said that both the Bush Administration and the oil company executives who participated in those meetings in 2001 should be held criminally liable for an illegal war and extortion of Iraq's oil.

"In March of 2001, when the Bush Administration began to have secret meetings with oil company executives from Exxon, Shell and BP, spreading maps of Iraq oil fields before them, the price of oil was $23.96 per barrel. Then there were 63 companies in 30 countries, other than the US, competing for oil contracts with Iraq.

read more


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

America has a Double Standard When It Comes to Kids. Victims if Prostitutes,...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


By Dave Lindorff

Double standards when it comes to children are pretty appalling—especially when it comes to "our" kids vs. "their" kids, but here in America they aren't limited to just right-wingers.

Take reaction to the US Supreme Court's latest ruling that you cannot execute rapists—even those who rape children—on the theory that only killing someone justifies execution.

Politicians who make their careers by promoting state sponsored murder have been quick to condemn this latest "liberal outrage" by calling for more laws that would make execution the punishment for raping a child (admittedly a monstrous crime).

"Anybody in the country who cares about children should be outraged that we have a Supreme Court that would issue a decision like this," says Republican Alabama Attorney General Troy King, who said the court's 5-4 decision makes America "a less safe place to grow up."

read more


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Sgt. José Pequeño / Age 34 / Sugar Hill, New Hampshire



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


José was the youngest police chief in the state of New Hampshire, forever. But then he was in the National Guard, and they asked for volunteers. It was on March 1, 2006. They were guarding an Iraqi police station and got a tip it was going to be hit. One of the bombers' cars hit the police station, blew it up, and my son was calling in to base when they threw a grenade through the open part of the Humvee. The driver died instantly. When they found José, the lower part of his body was still inside the Humvee but the explosion had gone under his helmet and the left part of his brain was out in the sand.

I used to work nights. I got home at 7 am, couldn't sleep, when there was a phone call. "We need to notify you that your son had an accident and is in surgery." But they couldn't give me any news how bad he was. I hung up, called my daughter and his dad, then kept calling Casualty Affairs every fifteen minutes. "As soon as we know, ma'am." Then, "They're flying him into Germany." Finally, when he got to Germany, they told me it was an injury on the head. "How bad is it?" "He's getting cleaned up, but we don't know the extent of the injury." I finally got to a nurse. "You tell me." "I'll have a neurosurgeon call." Two o'clock in the morning, I got a call from the neurosurgeon. "I'm still evaluating your son. I'll call you when I'm done." "How long?" "I've got like twenty minutes to go." And I said, "You've got twenty-two minutes. I'm his mom, for God's sake."

Twenty-five minutes later I got a call. A voice said, "Is this your son?" "Yes." "Such a beautiful son," he said. "What a terrible waste, a young man with such a life ahead of him, and he's going to die." Right there, a piece of me just left. "You're such a liar!" I yelled. "Of course my son is going to make it." After that, I asked, "Are you finished with your evaluation? Tell me exactly what's wrong with my son. Please." And he said, "He has a severe brain injury, severe bleeding; he's lost the bottom two lobes of his brain." And at that time, my daughter's boyfriend heard me scream and fall off the bed. I started throwing things. My next-door neighbor came running, and I sat down and cried and said, "I can't do this."

read more


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Congress Still Corrupt and Useless



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


    For those who thought Tom Delay's departure would really change anything in Congress, this past week was a strong cup of coffee. On Capitol Hill, politics and greed still trump the good of the nation, still trump the Constitution, still trump all.

    While nothing that happened in Washington this past week was new or should have surprised anyone, we were nonetheless served clear notice, anew, that this is a democracy under siege.

read more


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

First Official 'Dark Knight' Review Arrives!



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Cinematical by Erik Davis on 6/26/08

Filed under: , , , ,



Well, the day has finally come. No, you can't go see The Dark Knight in theaters yet ... but you can start reading what the critics had to say about it. First one in the batting cage is Peter Travers from Rolling Stone, who opens his review with: "Heads up: a thunderbolt is about to rip into the blanket of bland we call summer movies." Yeah! Where's your exclamation point at the end of that sentence, Travers? Get those troops fired up, dammit! (Bored? Try saying "Peter Travers Travels to Transylvania" ten times fast. Bet ya can't do it ...) Anyway ...

He continues to say nothing but great things about the movie, calling Heath Ledger -- and this is my favorite quote of the year so far -- "mad-crazy-blazing brilliant as the Joker." Of course, if someone is "mad-crazy-blazing brilliant," only one word can follow something like that up: Oscar. Travers says, "If there's a movement to get him the first posthumous Oscar since Peter Finch won for 1976's Network, sign me up." He gave the film itself three and a half stars out of four, and summed it all up by saying, "It's full of surprises you don't see coming. And just try to get it out of your dreams."

All kidding aside, I'm stoked to see a very, very positive review right out of the gate -- and I, for one, seriously hope The Dark Knight goes down as one of the best summer movies ever. But I do try not to hype it up too much, because that's always a bad thing. So forget we ever said anything. Dark Knight? What's that?

Permalink | Email this | Comments


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Today's Must Read



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via TPMMuckraker by Andrew Tilghman on 6/26/08

Sen. John McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, took leave from his lobbying firm in 2006. He often reminds us that he derives no income from the firm these days.

Yet Davis derived financial gain from his relationship with McCain for years after running the senator's first bid for the GOP nod in 2000 -- and would likely garner similar benefits even if McCain loses this time around.

A story in today's Washington Post offers some details about that relationship throughout the past eight years.

In all, Davis, his firm and a company he helped start have earned at least $2.2 million in part through their close association with McCain, his campaign and his causes, according to a review of federal campaign, tax and lobbyist disclosure records.

Davis's lobbying firm, Davis Manafort, has a client list that has included Verizon and SBC Communications, a Ukranian holding company Systems Capital Management and Russian magnate Oleg Deripaska, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin. He has also worked as an uregistered lobbyist representing the interests abroad of foreign politicians and businessmen.

After McCain dropped out of the Republican primary in 2000, Davis continued to work for -- and fundraise -- for the senator.

When McCain started the Reform Institute in 2001 to promote campaign finance reform, he turned to Davis. Though still actively lobbying, Davis pulled in $120,000 as an institute consultant in 2002.

Davis brought with him other McCain insiders, and fundraising took off. In 2003, tax filings show, Davis earned $110,000 in fees, and in 2004 and 2005, while he served as president of the institute, his salary totaled $165,000. Tax forms said he worked five hours a week or "as needed."

The Post profiles a few examples where Davis was raking in lobbying fees from companies that McCain was helping out on Capitol Hill.

In 2003, for instance, DHL Holdings (USA) and Airborne hired Davis to lobby the Senate to facilitate a merger. Hotly opposed by shipping giants FedEx and United Parcel Service, the merger encountered opposition from Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) on the commerce committee. McCain took steps that helped Davis's clients. He thwarted Stevens's effort to insert language into legislation that would prohibit foreign-controlled companies such as DHL from holding certain military contracts.

Davis's firm earned $125,000 from Airborne in 2003 and $465,000 from DHL parent company Deutsche Post World Net (USA) from 2003 to 2005, records show.

The Post also reminds us how Davis's outside business dealings have apparently caused tension inside the campaign, particularly last year when McCain was struggling with money and far behind in the polls. There was a lot of grumbling -- and still is -- about the firm 3eDC that Davis helped hire and also partly owned.

Davis has confirmed that he owns a stake in 3eDC. Over several months, McCain's campaign doled out payments to the firm approaching $1 million.

The 3eDC contract initially brought objections from top advisers, who argued that it smacked of self-dealing. After the summer campaign shake-up, it appeared that payments to the firm ceased.


Davis is not alone among those in the campaign who have recently shed their lobbying ties but may have banked some money in previous years.
Longtime fundraiser Carla Eudy earned $138,434 working for McCain's 2000 presidential bid. But she made far more -- $813,000 -- working for McCain's leadership committee, the Reform Institute, and another nonprofit McCain chaired, the International Republican Institute, tax records show. Some of the money has gone to her company. Trevor Potter, McCain's top lawyer, has brought in nearly $750,000 in fees for his law firms by working for such endeavors, as well as $949,000 in compensation over five years for the nonprofit he helped create, the Campaign Legal Center, which has defended in court the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, tax records show.
ad_icon

Firms run by Rebecca Donatelli, McCain's Internet strategist in 2000, have since then done more than $700,000 in work for McCain-related endeavors, though the campaign notes that some of that money has gone to cover credit card transaction fees for money raised online.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Cloture Vote on FISA Passes, 80-15



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Crooks and Liars by Nicole Belle on 6/26/08

Firedoglake

The FISA Cloture vote just passed. The Senate will now consider the motion to proceed with the bill, then they'll head to the bill itself (corrected procedural details, h/t and thanks to CBolt). Various motions will be put forward to strip immunity, odds are they will fail. Then a number of the 80 who voted to restrict debate will vote against FISA so they can say they were against the bill. However this was the real vote, and the rest is almost certainly nothing but kabuki for the rubes.

Obama and McCain were both absent, as was Clinton. Unimpressive, but unsurprising, though I suppose I'm disappointed by Clinton (Obama has made it clear he didn't intend to try and stop the bill.) Clinton and Obama will claim there was no point since it wasn't close. But, with their leadership, it might well have gone the other way.

Cenk Uygur and Ben Mankiewicz of The Young Turks interview Russ Feingold on how egregious all this FISA posturing is for Democratic values. 

Cenk Ugyur: Alright, so let's get to the specifics of what's going to happen in the Senate, Senator Feingold, which is, you have promised to do a filibuster of this bill. How is the logistics of that going to work out? Does that come up first, and do you think you're going to be able to muster out 40 senators on your side to be able to do it? Forty one senators? Can you tell us the latest on that?

Senator Russ Feingold: Sure. Well I'm not optimistic that we're going to have 41 people stand tall on this, because I'm very concerned about the number of Democrats approaching this. But we've already started the process of what people normally call a filibuster. I mean, normally bills are just allowed to come up. We said, "No. We're going to make you wait two days, and you have to actually win a motion to proceed to the bill. Sixty votes, which happens today." So they first have to do that. Then we're going to talk about the bill for a while. A number of people wanted us to just allow it to go through with a couple of hours of debate. We said no. Senator Dodd and I have both spoken at length, and we both want to talk some more. There are also a number of people that want to offer amendments. And they said, "No, let's block that." We said no to that. They also asked if we could just let the bill have a final vote, and we said, "No. You're going to have a cloture petition. You're going to have to get 60 votes to have the final vote and cut off amendments." So we're going to demand that as well. So basically, what we're talking about is making sure they don't jam it through today or first thing tomorrow, but there will be a few days. The truth is, they would be able to stop this filibuster with 60 votes by the end of the week in any event. But we believe this is important enough to make them go through that process. That is the nature of the filibuster.

[snip]Ben Mankiewicz: If there were…what I was getting at there, or what I was about to ask is, if there were a movement in the leadership of the Senate to do this, could it be done? Or is it…

Senator Russ Feingold: Well, I think that would help. It would have helped if the Speaker not come down in favor of this thing. In fact, the majority leader has said that, of the Senate, he's going to vote against the bill. So that helps. But, you know, there's still a whole bunch of people that might be a little surprising that, who have been with us all the way, who are saying, "Well now it's time to do this because it's a compromise. It's at least an improvement." That's not true. It's absolute window dressing.

Don't let up on your phone calls.  Christy at FDL has other suggestions for actions you can take to make your voice heard.

UPDATE: Scalia v. Scalia…Dahlia Lithwick compares Scalia's arguments between the DC gun ban and Boumediene:

 The headline is that the court decided 5-4 (no mushy plurality here) that the D.C. handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement violate the individual right to bear arms as protected under the Second Amendment. But I must first pass along this rather brilliant observation from professor Stephen Wermiel from American University, who wonders why none of the dissenters cautioned the majority that today's decision "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed." (Boumediene, Scalia, J. dissenting.)


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

IT Students Contract Out Coursework To India



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Slashdot by CmdrTaco on 6/26/08

An anonymous reader writes "Students studying computing in the UK and US are outsourcing their university coursework to graduates in India and Romania. Work is being contracted out for as little as £5 on contract coding websites usually used by businesses. Students are outsourcing everything from simple coursework to full blown final year dissertations. It's causing a major headache for lecturers who say it is almost impossible to detect." The irony of course is that if they actually get jobs in the sector, this will be how they actually work anyway.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Always There With A Helping Hand



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Original Microsoft Crew Reunites For Photo



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via CyberNet by Ashley on 6/26/08

As we've mentioned this week already, tomorrow is Bill Gates' last day at Microsoft in a full-time position. It's what he's known for the last several decades, and it's the company he co-founded, so this is big news. People are putting together various tributes to the man who helped change the world we live, and BBC decided to take a look at the original Microsoft staff and see where they are today.

You've probably already seen the photo below because we included it in an earlier article about "Little known Facts About Bill Gates." It shows the early team that made up Microsoft in 1978. They sure look young, don't they? This photo was taken back when they were based out of New Mexico.

Microsoft team 1978

Recently the gang (even though all of them but Gates have left Microsoft) got back together for a reunion, and a new picture was taken.

microsoft crew reunited.png

All are pictured in the updated picture except Bob Wallace who died in 2002 (back row, middle in the original), and they are all standing in the same spots. They managed to emerge out of the 70's pretty well, didn't they?

It was definitely a smart thing for them to get together and re-take the picture, because now it will be even more memorable.

Copyright © 2008 CyberNet | CyberNet Forum | Learn Firefox

Related Posts:


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

This Rejected Chiropractor Is "Sorry You Don't Take Your Health Seriously" [...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 6/26/08

The excellent blog, Passive Aggressive Notes has a submission from a reader who rejected his chiropractor. Clay decided not to go back after the doctor refused to show him his x-rays unless Clay attended a seminar about payment plants and treatment options. A few days later he got a note that said:

Dear Clay,

Thank you for taking the time to chat with my office staff the other day regarding your care here at [redacted] Chiropractic.

I am sorry that you do not take your health seriously. When you decide to make your health a priority, please know we are available to help you.

I urge you to take good care of your health and contact us immediately if you run into any problems. It's been a pleasure to be of service to you.

Oh, no! He's not taking it seriously!

Spinal Manipulation [Passive Aggressive Notes]



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Would You Like To "Opt-In" To Your Bank's Overdraft Fees? Tell The Federal R...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 6/26/08

The Federal Reserve has proposed some new regulations that would, among other things, require banks to let you opt-out of the "overdraft protection" services that often result in consumers being charged large fees for buying one too many (or 6 too many) packs of gum with their debit cards. The Center for Responsible Lending thinks the programs should be "opt-in". Either way, without the overdraft program, your debit or atm transaction would be denied for non-sufficient funds and you would not be charged a overdraft fee.

From the Proposed Rules:

Among other things, the proposal would require institutions to provide consumers the ability to opt out of their institutions' payment of overdrafts. The Board is proposing to amend Regulation DD to ensure that consumers receive effective disclosures about their right to opt out of overdraft services, by setting forth certain content, format and timing requirements for the notice.

The Center For Responsible Lending argues (emphasis ours):

Given the low likelihood that people will unsubscribe, the default policy should place consumers in the arrangement that provides them with the greatest benefit, which is clearly not one that costs Americans more in fees than the amount of the loans themselves. In fact, with debit overdrafts, the cost averages twice the amount of the transaction, while the cost of being denied is zero. If consumers were warned they would be charged a $34 fee for buying a $2 donut, they might instead choose to hand the clerk a $5 bill – or skip the donut. The proposed rule would only be justified if consumers preferred to be enrolled in these overdraft programs and received real benefits from them. But evidence overwhelmingly shows that consumers don't want overdraft loans and don't benefit from them; thus, they should not be strapped with the burden of escaping this expensive trap.

The Federal Reserve has asked that consumers who are affected by overdraft programs submit their opinion of the proposed rules. If you're interested in this issue, you can give the proposed rules a read (PDF) and then submit your comments to the Federal Reserve via email. To do so, place "Docket No. R-1315" in the subject of your email, and send it to: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov

If you'd like more information from the Center For Responsible Lending, you can get it here: "Support Opt-In Requirement for Overdraft Fees" (PDF)

Proposed Rules, Truth in Savings (PDF)
(Photo: Morton Fox )



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Just How Racist Was Aunt Jemima? [Classic Ads]



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Gawker by Hamilton Nolan on 6/25/08

AJ3.jpegIf you go to the "Our History" section of the Aunt Jemima website, it gives a rather whitewashed rundown of key moment's in the company's long life. It was founded in 1889, and 100 years later, "the image of Aunt Jemima was updated by removing her headband and giving her pearl earrings and a lace collar." But what about the image of Aunt Jemima, say, six or seven decades ago? Did she still "stand for warmth, nourishment and trust"? Well kind of, but it was more of a nourishment and trust of racism. Embrace your past, Quaker Oat Company! We dug through the archives for some classic Aunt Jemima ads from the 1940s, and it's true what they say: "Happifyin' Aunt Jemima Pancakes Sho' Sets Folks Singin'!" About racism!:








[via the Gallery of Graphic Design]



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Guerilla gardening in Tokyo



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Boing Boing by Mark Frauenfelder on 6/25/08

tokyo-gardebs.jpg

Some great photos of guerilla gardening in Tokyo from Kirainet.com.

Look at the girl in the picture, she is planting some tomatoes in little corner between two roads in the middle of Tokyo. Isn't it amazing? She cares about that little place of land lost in Tokyo's immensity, and what is more amazing is that she doesn't seem worried about people or dogs destroying her tomatoes and her lavender.

Previously on Boing Boing:
Guerilla gardening in London
LA Times on guerrilla gardeners



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Blackwater owner requests Shari’a law to avoid paying lawsuit damages



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Boing Boing by Mark Frauenfelder on 6/25/08

Presidential Airways, a division of the private military company Blackwater Worldwide, is being sued for wrongful death by the families of three soldiers killed in a plane crash in Afghanistan.

The company has asked the court to use Shari'a Islamic law to make a ruling on the lawsuit. Why would a right-wing Christian company like Blackwater want to do that?

If the judge agrees, it would essentially end the lawsuit over a botched flight supporting the U.S. military. Shari'a law does not hold a company responsible for the actions of employees performed within the course of their work.

Erik Prince, who owns Blackwater and Presidential Airways, briefly discussed the lawsuit in a meeting today with editors and reporters at The News & Observer. Prince was asked to justify having a case involving an American company working for the U.S. government decided by Afghan law.

"Where did the crash occur?" Prince said. "Afghanistan."

According to NPR, Blackwater has over $800 million in government contracts.

Blackwater says crash lawsuit governed by Islamic law (via Reason)



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Pictured: The moment a mother loses a desperate battle to save her duckling from the jaws of a heron | Mail Online

Pictured: The moment a mother loses a desperate battle to save her duckling from the jaws of a heron | Mail Online

How can we bring troops home from Iraq faster? ... [But What About The Soldi...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Fleshbot by Dashiell Bennett on 6/25/08

How can we bring troops home from Iraq faster? Apparently, we just need to send them all porn, because that will get them kicked out of the country. Seems like an unusual strategy, but it's just crazy enough to work. (bostonmagazine.com)



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Feingold on FISA “Compromise”: “It’s not even a fig leaf; it’s a joke.”



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Crooks and Liars by SilentPatriot on 6/25/08

Senator Russ Feingold joined Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! Tuesday to speak out about the reprehensible FISA "compromise" brokered by House Leader Steny Hoyer. Feingold has always been the most articulate and outspoken voice on Constitutional liberties, and he sure didn't hold back.

video_wmv Download | Play video_mov Download | Play (h/t Heather)

SEN. RUSS FEINGOLD: It's not even a fig leaf; it's a joke. It does not in any way prevent the ruling from that court, basically automatically, of immunity, because it just involves saying, "Look, they've got a piece of paper from the government." This is nothing but Democrats trying to pretend that they're doing something here. They are doing nothing. They're giving in. [Missouri Republican] Senator Kit Bond is basically giggling at the fact that the Republicans and the administration got essentially everything they want on this. It's sadly a great failure on the part of the Democratic majority that was elected in 2006 primarily to get us out of Iraq, but also significantly to protect the Constitution of the United States. This is not a proud moment.

Do you hear that, Democrats? The GOP is laughing at your craven weakness. Hell, your approval numbers are higher with Republicans than they are with the people who put you in power to supposedly protect their rights. Do what you were elected to do and filibuster this bill until the real intelligence gaps are closed and the telecoms are compelled to prove they didn't violate federal law by helping the most unpopular President in American history spy on us.

When, precisely, did it become unfashionable (even taboo) to stand strong on protecting core American values? Have we really allowed George Bush to fundamentally alter the character of our country? Be sure to tune into CSPAN-2 tomorrow to see whether or not there are any true leaders in the Democratic party willing to fight the good fight.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

San Francisco Green Party endorses Cindy Sheehan run against Speaker of the ...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


Greens will be strong ally

SAN FRANCISCO (June 24, 2008) – The San Francisco Green Party – a powerful force in progressive San Francisco politics – has endorsed the independent run by peace activist Cindy Sheehan against Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D) in November.

The SFGP decision means Sheehan – who lost her son Casey in the war in Iraq – will have a strong ally in her bid to upset Pelosi in the 8th Congressional District. Greens hold several key San Francisco elected positions, including SF Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, and Mark Sanchez, president of the SF Board of Education, who is running for a supervisor slot.

"We are glad she is taking on Speaker Pelosi, who has been a huge disappointment even to her Democratic Party base," said Erika McDonald, spokesperson for the SFGP.

read more


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Wexler Pushed for Impeachment Hearings on the Olbermann Show on MSNBC Tonight



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Buh...buh...buh...but he's a MAVERICK!!



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Brilliant at Breakfast by Jill on 6/25/08

He's also a psychotic nutcase:


On June 20, 1996, Senator John McCain allegedly assaulted a family member of a Vietnam War prisoner of war (POW) who was missing in action (MIA), as a group of about 15 family members of POW/MIAs watched in astonishment. Within about one month, five ethics complaints had been filed with the Senate Ethics Committee by five eyewitnesses. But the Senate Ethics Committee refused to investigate the matter.

According to eyewitness Carol Hrdlicka, wife of Vietnam War POW/MIA air force pilot Col. David Hrdlicka, the group had been waiting in the hall of the Russell Office Building in Washington, D.C. for McCain to come out of an office in order to hand deliver letters asking him to forego an amendment to the Missing Service Personnel Act (MSPA) of 2005. The MSPA had been signed into law in February 1996 as part of the Defense Authorization Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-106). This law, which updated a 1942 law, had been a major victory for the families of POW/MIAs who worked tirelessly to get it through Congress.

The MSPA required the Pentagon to beef up its resources to find and rescue missing service personnel in a timely manner. For instance, it required the filing of reports on missing persons within 48 hours. Among other substantive provisions, it also criminalized withholding information from the families of POWs by broadly stipulating that "any person who knowingly and willfully withholds from the personnel file of a missing person any information relating to the disappearance or whereabouts and status of a missing person shall be fined as provided in title 18 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." McCain's amendment eviscerated these new changes. For instance, it increased the reporting time to 10 days, and it deleted entirely the stated provision penalizing the withholding of information.

These family members of POW/MIAs had come to speak with McCain to try to convince him to leave the law alone. Mrs. Hrdlicka gives the following description of what happened:

When he [McCain] realized who we were, his face turned red and he became enraged. He would not accept the letters we had brought, he burst through our group assaulting the niece of Jane Duke Gaylor, mother of a MIA. I followed Senator McCain down the hall asking that he leave the legislation alone and all the while he is denying that he knew anything about the Missing Personnel Act. ...As we reached the elevator he said to me that I didn't know what he had been through ... I then stated I understood what he had been through and David Hrdlicka was still going through it. I had the capture picture of my husband and tried to show the picture to him but he would not look at it. ...The elevator arrived and Senator McCain quickly jumped in -- that ended our conversation. After this incident we went to the Capitol Police and filed a report. We also sent complaints to the ethics committee on the Senator's behavior.

"He went from a smiling, congenial, happy face to a beet red, totally enraged face in an instant," she said. "I have never seen a senator act in this way. We were all dumbfounded how this happened. He threw his arm up, and she goes flying and Jane [who was in a wheelchair] gets pushed aside as he brushes by her. All I see is people flying and I'm behind him [McCain]... This was assault."


This is the man the media wants to see in the White House. This is the one they're calling an "independent" and a "maverick." The press has been bought off by some kind words and barbecued ribs, and in return they're going to do whatever is necessary to put an even more dangerous man than George W. Bush into the White House.

Sleep well, everyone.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Senator Chris Dodd, Constitutional Champion



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Crooks and Liars by SilentPatriot on 6/25/08

Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), who along with Russ Feingold has been the fiercest defender of Constitutional rights, took to the floor last night to deliver a two-hour impassioned speech in defense of the rule of law, and offered a scathing critique of the sham FISA bill about to become law.

video_wmv Download | Play video_mov Download | Play

"Mr President, I had hoped that I would not have to come to the floor under these circumstances again. I've fought this with everything I have in me. Today we are being asked to pass the so-called compromise that was reached by some of our colleagues and approved by the other body, the House of Representatives. I'm here this evening to say that I will not and I can not support this legislation. This legislation goes against everyhting I've stood for, everything this body ought to stand for in my view."

I'm somewhat of a CSPAN junkie, but Dodd's sincere respect and concern for this country's sacred principles and his passionate defense last night of those principles was the most uplifting yet depressing thing I have ever seen; uplifting because it proved to me that there are leaders out there who still give a damn, but depressing because, with rare exceptions, he is alone. When the history of the Bush years is written and future generations look back and wonder how we sank so low, how an abject failure like George W. Bush successfully transformed our national character, at least we can look back to times like these and know that there were some true patriots sounding the alarm.

Glenn Greenwald sums up the floor speech thusly:

Chris Dodd went to the Senate floor last night to speak against the FISA bill and delivered one of the most compelling and inspired speeches by a prominent politician that I've heard in quite some time. He tied the core corruption of the FISA bill's telecom amnesty and warranltess eavesdropping provisions into the whole litany of the Bush administration's lawless and destructive behavior over the last seven years — from torture and rendition to the abuse of secrecy instruments and Guantanamo mock trials — with a focus on the way in which telecom amnesty further demolishes the rule of law among our political class.

YouTube NCDem has another great clip:


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

US scientist calls for prosecution of energy company CEOs for global warming disinformation

US scientist calls for prosecution of energy company CEOs for global warming disinformation: "In testimony before the US Congress on Monday, James Hansen, a leading climatologist, called heads of major energy companies criminals who should be prosecuted for deliberately spreading false and misleading information about the threat posed by global warming."

Obama attacks US Supreme Court decision barring death penalty for child rape

Obama attacks US Supreme Court decision barring death penalty for child rape: "Commenting on the decision, Obama declared his support for the death penalty, both in principle and in the specific cases under consideration by the high court. “I have said repeatedly that I think that the death penalty should be applied in very narrow circumstances for the most egregious of crimes,” he told a news conference in Chicago. “I think that the rape of a small child, six or eight years old, is a heinous crime and if a state makes a decision that under narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances the death penalty is at least potentially applicable, that that does not violate our Constitution.”"

ESPN - Astros suspend pitcher Chacon indefinitely for insubordination - MLB

ESPN - Astros suspend pitcher Chacon indefinitely for insubordination - MLB: "HOUSTON -- Astros pitcher Shawn Chacon was suspended indefinitely by the team Wednesday for insubordination after reportedly grabbing general manager Ed Wade by the neck and throwing him to the ground."

Dodd Stands Strong, Obama Cowers and Whimpers and Waffles



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


Only 15 Senators stood up for the 4th Amendment today. Obama took his now customary course of NOT voting at all, neither Yes nor No. Here's the roll call.



read more


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Conflicting Reports: Is Bowman to Chicago Fact or Fiction? - FanHouse - AOL Sports Blog

Conflicting Reports: Is Bowman to Chicago Fact or Fiction? - FanHouse - AOL Sports Blog: "Sources have indicated to me that NHL legend Scotty Bowman has been offered a position with the Blackhawks in which Bowman would oversee everything regarding hockey operations.

His son Stan (named after the Stanley Cup) is currently the Assistant General Manager, Hockey Operations with the club.

Word is Bowman is expected to accept the job."

Holy shit that is awesome.......

Elliot D. Cohen: POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate | BuzzFlash.org

Elliot D. Cohen: POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate | BuzzFlash.org: "On June 20, 1996, Senator John McCain allegedly assaulted a family member of a Vietnam War prisoner of war (POW) who was missing in action (MIA), as a group of about 15 family members of POW/MIAs watched in astonishment. Within about one month, five ethics complaints had been filed with the Senate Ethics Committee by five eyewitnesses. But the Senate Ethics Committee refused to investigate the matter.

According to eyewitness Carol Hrdlicka, wife of Vietnam War POW/MIA air force pilot Col. David Hrdlicka, the group had been waiting in the hall of the Russell Office Building in Washington, D.C. for McCain to come out of an office in order to hand deliver letters asking him to forego an amendment to the Missing Service Personnel Act (MSPA) of 2005. The MSPA had been signed into law in February 1996 as part of the Defense Authorization Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-106). This law, which updated a 1942 law, had been a major victory for the families of POW/MIAs who worked tirelessly to get it through Congress."

McClatchy Washington Bureau | 06/25/2008 | Supreme Court slashes punitive award in Exxon Valdez oil spill

McClatchy Washington Bureau | 06/25/2008 | Supreme Court slashes punitive award in Exxon Valdez oil spill: "WASHINGTON — In a victory for corporations seeking to limit big-dollar lawsuits, the Supreme Court on Wednesday cut the $2.5 billion in punitive damages awarded in the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.

The court reduced the award to $507.5 million, dashing the hopes of more than 32,000 fishermen and Alaska Natives who've been waiting for nearly 20 years to hear whether Exxon Mobil Corp. must pay billions in punitive damages for its role in the Exxon Valdez disaster."

Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rape | Reuters

Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rape | Reuters: "WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court in a major capital punishment decision struck down on Wednesday the death penalty for child rape, its first ruling in more than 30 years on whether a crime other than murder can be punished by execution.

The nation's highest court ruled by a 5-4 vote that the death penalty for the crime of raping a child violated the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment."

Daily Show: Terror Attack + Election = Republicans



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Crooks and Liars by SilentPatriot on 6/25/08

  In light of Charlie Black's ridiculous and revealing comments to Fortune magazine Monday, Jon Stewart shows how Republicans are calculating their winning November strategy.

video_wmv Download | Play  video_mov Download | Play  (h/t Heather)

"Why is it that a terror attack helps Republicans? Well, it's quite simple. A terror attack, when added to an election, equals Republican. Why is that? Let's show our work. First we have to solve for 'R.' Now, if you add 7 1/2 years of Republican administration, times the five years we've been at war, which has divided the nation, add in the government's incompetent response to the domestic disaster of Katrina, minus the equity in your home thats disappeared, plus the price of oil squared, over the boon that the Iraq war has been to terrorist recruiting, times tortue, minus the resoucres we could have been using in Afghanistan, plus the resources we could have been using to catch bin Laden, carry the Cheney and…." 

Digg It!


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

The Dark Knight : Review : Rolling Stone

The Dark Knight : Review : Rolling Stone: "Heads up: a thunderbolt is about to rip into the blanket of bland we call summer movies. The Dark Knight, director Christopher Nolan's absolute stunner of a follow-up to 2005's Batman Begins, is a potent provocation decked out as a comic-book movie. Feverish action? Check. Dazzling spectacle? Check. Devilish fun? Check. But Nolan is just warming up. There's something raw and elemental at work in this artfully imagined universe. Striking out from his Batman origin story, Nolan cuts through to a deeper dimension. Huh? Wha? How can a conflicted guy in a bat suit and a villain with a cracked, painted-on clown smile speak to the essentials of the human condition? Just hang on for a shock to the system. The Dark Knight creates a place where good and evil — expected to do battle — decide instead to get it on and dance. 'I don't want to kill you,' Heath Ledger's psycho Joker tells Christian Bale's stalwart Batman. 'You complete me.' Don't buy the tease. He means it."

Government’s top energy forecaster: Offshore drilling won’t help at the pump.



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Think Progress by Satyam on 6/25/08

Reuters reports that in a briefing today, Guy Caruso of the Energy Information Administration — the government's "top energy forecaster" — said expanding offshore oil drilling would do little to lower gas prices:

"It would be a relatively small effect, because it would take such a long time to bring those supplies on," Caruso said during a briefing at the Center for Strategic and International Studies on the EIA's new long-term international energy forecast. "It doesn't affect prices that much."

In 2007, the EIA also concluded that offshore drilling "would not have a significant impact" on oil prices. The remarks today come after both Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and President Bush endorsed plans to expand offshore oil drilling in response to record gas prices.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Report says 1Gbps internet needed for US to stay competitive



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via AfterDawn.com on 6/25/08

Report says 1Gbps internet needed for US to stay competitiveA report commissioned by the e-NC Authority in North Carolina has dire warnings for the future if the US continues to fall behind other western nations in broadband internet deployment. It explains how the US has fallen behind so many other countries and characterizes it as a necessity for competing in the modern world rather than being a luxury along the lines of cable television.

"If the United States wants to preserve its high standard of living and quality of life, it must rapidly prepare its workforce to move up the value chain to knowledge-based jobs that can command the high wages that Americans have come to expect. This will require improvements in many areas, especially to our educational system and our advanced communications infrastructure," says the report.

The document proposes a remedy to the US' leadership void. It suggests the country needs a national plan to make 100Mbps internet connections available across the country by 2012, and 1Gbps connections by 2015.

Additionally it suggests that local governments be encouraged to establish their own networks if telecommunications companies don't step up to the challenge. They use the example of early deployment of electric service, when privately owned utilities didn't consider many small towns or most rural areas worth serving. Communities were forced to create public utilities of their own to fill the gap.

This last point in particular has been a major point of contention for the telecommunications industry. In some cases they've even gone so far as to sue municipalities to keep them out of the broadband internet business.

However, as the report accurately points out companies who aren't facing serious competition from newer services like Verizon's FiOS don't seem to see any compelling need to improve their networks. If you believe the report's conclusions on the importance of the internet you almost have to agree that ISPs aren't doing enough.

As the report states, addressing the issue requires thinking big, adopting high goals, and acting boldly. Anything less seems like a waste of precious time and resources.

Permalink | Comments



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

For Exxon, delay saves big bucks in Valdez spill



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Scholars and Rogues by Dr. Denny on 6/25/08

Nearly two decades after the Exxon Valdez ran around on Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound, the U.S. Supreme Court has taught Exxon (now ExxonMobil) and corporations everywhere a lesson:

Don't pay off legal judgments. Stall, stall, stall for 19 years.

Courts have held that Exxon must pay $2.5 billion in punitive damages for spilling 11 million gallons of crude oil that soiled 1,200 miles of Alaskan coastline. In 1994 a jury found Exxon Valdez captain Joseph Hazelwood and Exxon to be reckless. Hazelwood, who had been drinking before the single-hulled tanker hit the reef, had left the bridge as the vessel faced a difficult turn. The jury awarded $287 million in compensatory damages and originally $5 billion in punitive damages (later halved by another court).

But Exxon shouldn't have worried. The business-tilted Court whacked the already-reduced $2.5 billion by four-fifths.

Exxon sought to have the Supreme Court reduce the punitive award — and it succeeded. Exxon need shell out only $500 million to cover the commercial losses by the 32,677 commercial fishermen, business operators and landowners, Native Alaskans and municipalities party to the high-court case.

Those harmed by Exxon's operations in Prince William Sound will receive "an average of about $15,000 a person. They would have collected an average of $75,000 each under the $2.5 billion judgment," said an Associated Press story.

Justice David Souter, writing for the majority in a 5-3 decision, said that any penalty must be "reasonably predictable" in its severity.

Hogwash. Exxon ought to pay dearly for its poor decisions. Exxon should have known its operation of a single-hulled tanker by a captain with alcohol-related issues would have had "reasonably predictable" and severe environmental consequences — and attendant punitive consequences for the company.

But Exxon told the Court it has paid enough, having spent $3.4 billion in response to the vessel's grounding that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of wildlife. And the court, according to the AP, said "punitive damages may not exceed what the company already paid to compensate victims for economic losses, about $500 million compensation." [emphasis added]

What about punishment for the environmental consequences?

Exxon says its money has left Prince William Sound environmentally sound and thriving. Others disagree:

The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council reports that the multi-million dollar herring fish industry, which once supported thousands of lives and livelihoods in the area, remains closed indefinitely.

From the beginning, Exxon acted arrogantly. Its CEO refused to be interviewed. It delayed clean-up for two weeks in calm weather and began it in rough weather. A senior Exxon official did not appear on site for several days. Exxon spent $1.8 million for full-page ads in 166 newspapers; it apologized but failed to accept responsibility.

Over the years, Exxon has spent nearly $2 billion on public-relations efforts to evade responsibility and repair its image. It has paid lawyers dearly for nearly 20 years to stall paying what victims are due by appealing court decision after decision. Between PR and lawyers, Exxon's probably shelled out more than the original $5 billion punitive judgment.

Exxon delayed in any way it could, and low and behold, conservatism took hold in the Supreme Court. Exxon today found its punitive financial liability a mere pittance, only 10 percent of the original jury award. Moral: Stall, stall, stall …

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is ecstatic. In a press release, it presaged the future:

"This is good news for companies concerned about reining in excessive punitive damages," said Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "For years the Chamber has argued that punitive damages are too unpredictable and unfair, and today the Court agreed."

"The decision could have an effect far beyond federal maritime law," according to Robin Conrad, executive vice President of the National Chamber Litigation Center. "Limiting punitive damages to no more than the amount of a compensatory award will go a long way in cabining unpredictable punitive damages." [The NCLC is the chamber's public policy law firm.]

So corporations may continue to soil air, water and land and not fear "unpredictable and unfair" punitive judgments, thanks to Exxon's intransigence and the rightward tilt of the Court.

ExxonMobil continues to operate a single-hulled tanker in the vicinity of the Prince William spill. It is the only company to do so. In 2007, ExxonMobil earned a profit of $40.6 billion on sales of $404 billion. It earned $1,287 in profit for every second of 2007, according to a NYT story.

This has been a perfect storm: Exxon's risky Valdez escapade, its delaying tactics over two decades, and the rise of a conservative judiciary friendly to business has left those suffering social, financial, cultural and environmental costs with nothing but a Court-shredded oil boom to protect them.

photo credits:

• Exxon Valdez grounded on Bligh Reef: NOAA
• protective boom around salmon hatchery in Prince William Sound: NOAA


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Indiana Federal Court Strikes Down Law Allowing Random Computer Searches of ...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Don't Tase Me, Bro! by Phil Leggiere on 6/25/08

From "the fourth amendment is (if not necessarily well) still alive dept.

The Indianapolis Star reports

A federal court in Indianapolis ruled Tuesday that a major portion of the revised Indiana sex offender law cannot be enforced.

The ruling came one week before the new law would have gone into effect.

The modified law would have required that convicted sex offenders, after they served their sentences and probation and parole time, agree to have their personal computers searched at any time and to allow their Internet access to be monitored.

Tuesday, U.S. District Court in Indianapolis ruled that requirement of the new law went too far.

"These plaintiffs have rights under the Fourth Amendment," District Judge David F. Hamilton wrote in his ruling. "The state may not force them to waive those rights under threat of criminal prosecution for failing to do so."

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed the lawsuit as a class action on behalf of convicted sex offenders a few days after this year's session of the General Assembly expanded the requirements of the sex offender registration law.



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

What's Behind the Drive to War with Iran?



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


Ill-tempered neo-con extraordinaire, John Bolton, is pushing for war with Iran. On Sunday, June 22, he predicted longingly to FOX News that Israel would wait until after the November 4th general election to launch an attack on Iran.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Schumer to oppose FISA bill.



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Think Progress by Faiz on 6/25/08

Newsday reports that Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will oppose the FISA bill because it grants retroactive immunity to telecoms and expands the president's power to wiretap without court order. "If Schumer backs an effort to remove the immunity provisions, that could be a big deal," writes John Riley. "No signal yet from Sen. Clinton on her position, and it's not clear whether the Democrats will have enough votes to successfully attack the immunity issue."


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

U.S. Withholds Water For Political Motives



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 


Haitian Children At Well

The U.S. is under heavy criticism by human rights groups for withholding funds for clean water projects in Haiti as leverage for U.S.-led political reform in the country. A total of $54 million in loans to Haitians—70 of whom already lack daily access to potable water—is being delayed.


The New York Times:

An array of human rights groups has strongly criticized the United States government, saying it withheld money meant to provide clean drinking water to Haiti as leverage for political change in the country.

The activists, in a report released Monday, called the delay of $54 million in international loans to the Haitian government "one of the most egregious examples of malfeasance by the United States in recent years."

The loans from the Inter-American Development Bank were intended to revamp the water and sanitation systems in Les Cayes and Port-de-Paix, two Haitian towns in dire need of the money to improve their infrastructure. Nearly 70 percent of Haitians lack regular and direct access to potable water, experts say. The lack of clean water contributes to intestinal parasites and amoebic dysentery.

Read more

READ THE WHOLE ITEM

Related Entries


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Immunity Provision Invites Phone Companies to Cooperate with Illegal Governm...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Emptywheel by emptywheel on 6/25/08

Senator Feingold made an important argument in the Senate today. He explains how the FISA immunity provision invites telecoms to cooperate with illegal government programs.

For starters, current law already provides immunity from lawsuits for companies that cooperate with the government's request for assistance, as long as they receive either a court order or a certification from the Attorney General that no court order is needed and the request meets all statutory requirements. But if requests are not properly documented, FISA instructs the telephone companies to refuse the government's request, and subjects them to liability if they instead decide to cooperate. This framework, which has been in place for 30 years, protects companies that act at the request of the government while also protecting the privacy of Americans' communications.

Some supporters of retroactively expanding this already existing immunity provision argue that the telephone companies should not be penalized if they relied on a high-level government assurance that the requested assistance was lawful. Mr. President, as superficially appealing as that argument may sound, it utterly ignores the history of FISA.

Telephone companies have a long history of receiving requests for assistance from the government. That's because telephone companies have access to a wealth of private information about Americans – information that can be a very useful tool for law enforcement. But that very same access to private communications means that telephone companies are in a unique position of responsibility and public trust. And yet, before FISA, there were basically no rules to help the phone companies resolve the tension between the government's requests for assistance in foreign intelligence investigations and the companies' responsibilities to their customers.

This legal vacuum resulted in serious governmental abuse and overreaching. The abuses that took place are well documented and quite shocking. With the willing cooperation of the telephone companies, the FBI conducted surveillance of peaceful anti-war protesters, journalists, steel company executives – and even Martin Luther King Jr.

Congress decided to take action. Based on the history of, and potential for, government abuses, Congress decided that it was not appropriate for telephone companies to simply assume that any government request for assistance to conduct electronic surveillance was legal. Let me repeat that: a primary purpose of FISA was to make clear, once and for all, that the telephone companies should not blindly cooperate with government requests for assistance.

At the same time, however, Congress did not want to saddle telephone companies with the responsibility of determining whether the government's request for assistance was a lawful one. That approach would leave the companies in a permanent state of legal uncertainty about their obligations.

So Congress devised a system that would take the guesswork out of it completely. Under that system, which was in place in 2001, and is still in place today, the companies' legal obligations and liability depend entirely on whether the government has presented the company with a court order or a certification stating that certain basic requirements have been met. If the proper documentation is submitted, the company must cooperate with the request and will be immune from liability. If the proper documentation has not been submitted, the company must refuse the government's request, or be subject to possible liability in the courts.

The telephone companies and the government have been operating under this simple framework for 30 years. The companies have experienced, highly trained, and highly compensated lawyers who know this law inside and out.

In view of this history, it is inconceivable that any telephone companies that allegedly cooperated with the administration's warrantless wiretapping program did not know what their obligations were. And it is just as implausible that those companies believed they were entitled to simply assume the lawfulness of a government request for assistance. This whole effort to obtain retroactive immunity is based on an assumption that doesn't hold water.

That brings me to another issue, Mr. President. I've been discussing why retroactive immunity is unnecessary and unjustified, but it goes beyond that. Granting companies that allegedly cooperated with an illegal program this new form of automatic, retroactive immunity undermines the law that has been on the books for decades – a law that was designed to prevent exactly the type of actions that allegedly occurred here.

Remember, telephone companies already have absolute immunity if they complied with the applicable law. And they have an affirmative defense if they believed in good faith that they were complying with that law. So the retroactive immunity provision we're debating here is necessary only if we want to extend immunity to companies that did not comply with the applicable law and did not even have a good faith belief that they were complying with it. So much for the rule of law.

Even worse, granting retroactive immunity under these circumstances will undermine any new laws that we pass regarding government surveillance. If we want companies to follow the law in the future, it sends a terrible message, and sets a terrible precedent, to give them a "get out of jail free" card for allegedly ignoring the law in the past.

I find it particularly troubling when some of my colleagues argue that we should grant immunity in order to encourage the telephone companies to cooperate with the government in the future. They want Americans to think that not granting immunity will damage our national security. But if you take a close look at the argument, it doesn't hold up. The telephone companies are already legally obligated to cooperate with a court order, and as I've mentioned, they already have absolute immunity for cooperating with requests that are properly certified. So the only thing we'd be encouraging by granting immunity here is cooperation with requests that violate the law. Mr. President, that's exactly the kind of cooperation that FISA was supposed to prevent.

And let's remember why. These companies have access to our most private conversations, and Americans depend on them to respect and defend the privacy of these communications unless there is clear legal authority for sharing them. They depend on us to make sure the companies are held accountable for betrayals of that public trust. Instead, this immunity provision would invite the telephone companies to betray that trust by encouraging cooperation with illegal government programs.

That pretty much sums it up: this immunity provision is an effort to incent telecoms to participate in illegal spying programs.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

SCOTUS slashes Exxon damages for Valdez spill by $2 billion.



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Think Progress by Ali on 6/25/08

This morning, the Supreme Court issued a 5-3 decision (Justice Samuel Alito did not participate) slashing punitive damages Exxon Mobil must pay for the 1989 Valdez spill disaster from $2.5 billion to $500 million. "Nearly 33,000 Alaskans are in line to share in the award," AP reports, which have been cut now from $75,000 each to about $15,000.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

TicketsMyWay: Sell Tickets You Don't Have, Keep Money, Threaten Customers, P...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 6/25/08

A reader sent in the following tip about a Vegas-based ticket broker:

There is a company by the name of Ticketsmyway.com (Event Tickets LLC) that has the scam of the century running. Their operations run like this.
  • Advertise tickets slightly cheaper than Stubhub and other sites.
  • Consumers place an order online for tickets often months in advance
  • Credit cards are charged full amount immediately
  • Customers are told to check status of order online
  • Orders always show as "processing"
  • As date of event gets closer, customer starts calling to find out Status of shipping
  • 1-2 days before event, customer are told tickets are "no longer available"
  • Phone rep says a refund can only be requested online
  • Terms of Use online say any refund request is considered a "cancellation" and customer is charged 45% of the purchase price

Even though company cannot produce tickets, customers lose 45% of their entire purchase price.

The reader adds, "After first call that gets through, company notes number and consumer can NEVER AGAIN get through. Calls are forwarded to a voicemail account."

We looked around online and indeed there were lots of complaints about TicketsMyWay and Event Tickets LLC. Tracy at Rip-off Report says a live CSR told her the tickets were going to be shipped within a few weeks—but they never arrived. When Tracy finally got through to the same CSR again, she was told they were no longer available. A second CSR offered to replace the tickets for $200 more, despite the fact that "their terms and conditions clearly state, if your seats are no longer available they reserve the right to upgrade or provide comparable tickets at NO EXTRA COST."

A customer at onerave.com claims only six of his eight tickets were shipped, because ticketsmyway added $332 in shipping and handling fees "and decided to make up the difference by removing two tickets!"

Rocky at pissedconsumer.com spent four days seeing "processing" on his order and not getting his calls returned. He finally canceled the order and disputed the charges. "I never heard back from them until I received a lawsuit package saying I have to pay by 5/30/08 or go to court."

After our tipster contacted us, she sent in a follow-up email a few days later:

Fyi, I just received a call from someone (no name given) at that company threatening legal action if I continue to "make slanderous statements about them." From other stories online, this is their basic modus operandi and strong-arm intimidation tactic to get consumers to stay quiet about being defrauded and scammed. They steal from you and THEY threaten legal action. What country are we living in again?

Stay far, far away from ticketsmyway and Event Tickets LLC.

(Photo: Getty)



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Western Digital HD Ships With Super Secret Asian Lady Porn! [Western Digital]



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 6/25/08

Xdeliriumx wrote in to tell us that the Western Digital hard drive he recently bought new from Best Buy had hidden dirty pics buried on it. He was running a program to retrieve some accidentally deleted images when he discovered the secret files. Read his story below.

Imagine my dismay when, while playing around with folders on my external hard drive (Western Digital 160GB), I deleted all of my personal pictures. Pictures of myself, my friends, my cats, parties and vacations all deleted in one fell swoop. It is times like these when it's good to have a friend that downloads all of Lifehacker's suggested applications. This friend turned me onto a little program called PhotoRescue (http://www.datarescue.com/photorescue/v3/) for Mac, which I used and it worked in restoring nearly everything on my hard drive, including videos.

Though, perhaps this program worked too well.

Upon examining the cornucopia of recovered pictures and videos I stumbled upon a few gems that were not my own. Unfamiliar Asian faces accompanied my pictures of the Philadelphia Flyers playoff game and concerts past. Puzzled, I examined these first few pictures. The list started with a few anime pictures. I must add, I have not once watched an anime movie or even viewed an anime site on my computer — ever. Scrolling down the list I came across some pictures that perplexed me even more. My best guess at the next few pictures was what seemed like some type of Asian CD artwork, an American Express picture, and a picture of Asian Norton Anti-Virus?

And then I got to the good stuff - naked Asian ladies.

I wish I could say that the pictures on the hard drive were mine; however, I am positive they are not. Believe me, I would be the first to admit if they were.

My question now is, how did these pictures get there? No one else had access to the hard drive and I bought it brand new from Best Buy. Was Western Digital selling refurbished hard drives as new? Were the people assembling these hard drives testing them by loading some porn onto them to test them out? That's where The Consumerist comes in.

Have you heard any similar cases as mine or do you have any insight into my mysterious HD of porn?

We're as curious as you are, xdeliriumx.



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Bank Of America Treats Parking Meter Payments As Cash Advances, Charges $10 ...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Alex Chasick on 6/25/08

Reader Gary used his Bank of America credit card to pay $2 on a parking meter in Washington, DC. Bank of America treated it as a cash advance and slapped him with a $10 fee, as well as a higher APR. When Gary called to complain, he learned that it wasn't an error: Bank of America has started treating payments to parking meters as cash advances and may even treat all payments to government entities as cash advances.

For the unfamiliar, multispace meters, also called "Pay and Display" machines, are a central machine where drivers can purchase time on a particular space or print out a ticket to display on their dashboards; most machines accept bills and credit/debit cards, allowing drivers without quarters to purchase parking. Obviously, a $10 service charge negates this convenience.
Gary writes:

I recently used my bank of America credit card to pay for a multi-space parking meter in Washington DC. The type electronic meter common in urban areas for parking on the street and which accepts credit card payments. The charge for parking was $2. Bank of America treats this charge as a cash advance. They charged me a $10 cash advance fee on top. So now I will be thinking twice before using any bank of America cards. A transaction that should cost $2 can come out costing $12. Also, my card currently has a 0% promotional APR on purchases, but they put the $2 parking purchase in a separate category subject to a much higher interest rate.

Gary sent us a follow-up the next day:

I spoke to their CSR twice and I never really got an adequate explanation. I am attaching a copy of the email explanation they sent me. From what I understood, they now treat payments to government entities as quasi-cash transactions. During my last conversation the CSR explained that parking meters and payments of fines would now be treated as quasi-cash transactions subject to a minimum fee of $10. I think this is something new that they recently introduced and I have requested an updated version of my terms of service to get a better understanding of these fees.

(Photo: dM.nyc™)



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Weis Blames 8-Year-Old's Parents in Shooting



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Chicagoist by Margaret Lyons on 6/25/08

2008_6_25.josue.jpgPolice Superintendent Jody Weis said yesterday that the parents of 8-year-old shooting victim Josue Torres Jr. are at fault.

"I hate to say it, but the parents are to blame for that 8-year-old being shot. They choose to engage in this activity. Now we have an innocent 8-year-old who is shot...[The boy's step-father is] engaging in gang activity and, more than likely, he's probably breaking some laws. ... As long as we have people who are willing to break the law and engage in criminal activities, these are some of the consequences that we face. We have an innocent boy whose dreams will be shattered, whose family's dreams are shattered and it's horrible and we've got to do something about it."

Josue is in stable condition. He was wounded in a drive-by shooting Monday night while sitting in his step-father's van. Carlos Feliciano, Josue's step-father, says he's not involved in criminal activity, and Weis didn't provide any details or evidence that Feliciano was the intended target. [S-T, WBBM]



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Owning A Monkey Soon To Be Illegal



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Chicagoist by Marcus Gilmer on 6/25/08

2008_06_25monkeys.jpgFloods? Housing crisis? Crippled economy? Bah! says Congress. By a 3-to-1 margin (302-96), the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Captive Primate Safety Act which would amend the currently imposed Lacey Act by adding "nonhuman primates" to the list of "live animal of any prohibited wildlife species." The bill has 26 sponsors, including Mark Kirk (R), Jan Schakowsky (D), and Luis Gutierrez (D), all of Illinois.

Animal rights groups such as the Humane Society, ASPCA, and PETA have supported the act, which would cost about $4 million annually over the next five years, mostly so the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service can hire more workers to enforce the new law. Though I'm no big animal activist, I love monkeys (who doesn't) and am all for protecting them from moronic owners who probably couldn't even keep a hamster alive, much less a primate. But...um...yeah, thanks, Congress. Way to keep your priorities in line. Now that we have this out of the way, maybe we can FINALLY focus on what's really important: eliminating steroids from baseball and fixing college football's bowl system.

Image of pygmy marmoset monkey courtesy of Scott Kinmartin



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

The Daily Muck



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via TPMMuckraker by John Amick on 6/25/08

A report by the Government Accountability Office says that more than $2 billion given to Pakistan by the U.S. government to fund counterterrorism efforts may not have been used for its intended purpose. U.S.-funded army roads and bunkers may never have even been built, with the millions of U.S. dollars going to unknown uses. (Washington Post)

A U.S. Army officer, Maj. John Cockerham, and his wife, Melissa Cockerham, pleaded guilty to a money laundering scheme involving contracts in Iraq. Maj. Cockerham, who was responsible for awarding contracts worth millions of dollars, admitted to taking or being promised over 9 million dollars in bribes for contracts while in Kuwait. (Associated Press)

The Attorney General's office in Illinois is planning to file a civil suit Wednesday against mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp and its chief executive Angelo Mozilo after an investigation which began last fall. The Attorney General's office claims that Countrywide engaged in "unfair and deceptive practices" in the sale of their mortgage loans to homeowners. (Wall Street Journal)

With the Supreme Court ruling to allow detainees the right to appeal their imprisonment two weeks ago, a law firm that accepted the cases of six Algerian detainees at Gitmo has larger than expected commitments to its clients. The Boston law firm Wilmer Hale donated nearly $17 million in free legal help to the accused thus far, making it the largest pro bono case in the history of the 90-year old firm. (Boston Globe)

Two American businessmen were charged on Monday for selling military parts to Iran for the Iranian air fleet. The two men ran a company in Fort Lauderdale shipping aviation parts to the United Arab Emirates for resale in Iran. This is the latest in a series of cases this year of U.S. businesspeople selling aircraft parts, weapons, and engineering software to Iran. (New York Times)

The U.S. Department of Labor is investigating the nation's largest immigrant law firm over allegations that it helped U.S. corporations hire thousands of immigrants for high-paying jobs over American job applicants. While it is legal for law firms to suggest people for companies to hire, it is illegal for them to dissuade companies from hiring U.S workers. (Associated Press)

Adam Kidan, a former partner of lobbyist Jack Abramoff in a Florida casino deal, is seeking a sentence relief after pleading guilty in 2006 to fraud. Kidan, to be released in 2011, blames the ongoing investigation of Abramoff as reason for his prolonged wait for an abbreviated sentence. (Fort Mill Times)

Former U.S. Housing and Urban Development secretary Jack Kemp is implicated through his equity groups part in an FBI investigation of a Philadelphia-based loan broker's financial and real estate firms. The investigation stems from allegations that the groups' "Advance Fee" plan collected nonrefundable fees from potential borrowers with "no intention of providing financing." (Wall Street Journal)

The legendary espionage case of Julius and Ethen Rosenberg received new life this week, as a federal district court approved the public release of nearly 60-year-old grand jury testimony from the trial. Prosecutors only agreed to publish the testimony of deceased witnesses, and still oppose offering any records involving the ten witnesses still alive. (New York Times)


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Truthdig - Ear to the Ground - Obama to Pay for Party Unity

Truthdig - Ear to the Ground - Obama to Pay for Party Unity

Barack Obama is reaching out to Hillary Clinton’s pocketbook, asking his finance team to help pay off at least $10 million of the debt Clinton accrued during her primary bid. The move comes after an announcement that Camp Obama had raised $287 million by the end of May and declined public funding of his campaign.


The Guardian:

Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama has asked his finance team to help his former opponent Hillary Clinton pay off a debt of at least $10m (£6m) from her failed presidential campaign.

In a teleconference with his top fundraisers yesterday afternoon, Obama asked them to help the former first lady, a campaign spokesman confirmed.

Later at a star-studded fundraising gala in Los Angeles, the Illinois senator, who could become America’s first black president, appealed to those in the crowd who might have supported Clinton.

“I know I caused some heartburn and some frustration,” he said, adding that he and Clinton “were allies then and we’re allies now.”

Read more

Court Rewards Exxon for Valdez Oil Spill



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Greg Palast by Greg Palast on 6/25/08

by Greg Palast

Chicago Tribune (revised from 2003 article)

June 25, 2008

Twenty years after Exxon Valdez slimed over one thousand miles of Alaskan beaches, the oily company has yet to pay the $5 billion in punitive damages awarded by the jury.  And now they won't have to.  The Supreme Court today cut Exxon's liability by 90% to half a billion.  It's so cheap, it's like a permit to spill.

Exxon knew this would happen.  Right after the spill, I was brought in by Natives of Alaska to investigate oil company frauds that led to to the disaster.  In San Diego, I met with Exxon's US production chief, Otto Harrison, whose company offered the Alaskan Natives pennies on the dollar.   The oil men added a cruel threat: take it or leave it and wait twenty years to get even the pennies.  Exxon is immortal - but Natives die.

And they did.  A third of the Native fishermen and seal hunters I worked with are dead.  Now their families will collect ten cents on the dollar of their award, two decades too late.

Between 1989 and 2008, the company worked hard to buy themselves a White House and the Supreme Court to go with it.  They succeeded - beyond our wildest nightmares.

Now read the story you won't get on the Petroleum Broadcasting System.

Don't Buy Exxon's Fable Of The Drunken Captain

Thirty years ago this month, Alaskan natives sold Exxon and its partners an astronomically valuable patch of land -- the oil terminal at Valdez -- for a single dollar.

The Chugach Natives of the Prince William Sound refused cash. Rather, in 1969, they asked only that the oil companies promise to protect their fishing and seal hunting grounds from oil.

In 1971, Exxon and partners agreed to place the Natives' specific list of safeguards into federal law. These commitment to safety reassured enough Congressmen for the oil group to win, by one vote, the right to ship oil from Valdez.

On Wednesday, March 24, the Tenth Anniversary of the Exxon Valdez disaster was commemorated with the re-telling of lies. The official story is, "Drunken Skipper Hits Reef." Don't believe it.

This story remains untold: the true cause of the Exxon Valdez catastrophe was the oil giants' breaking their promises to the Natives and Congress, cynically and disastrously, in the fifteen years leading up to the spill. As to Captain Joe Hazelwood, he was below decks, sleeping off his bender. At the helm, the third mate would never have collided with Bligh Reef had he looked at his Raycas radar. But the radar was not turned on. In fact, the tanker's radar was left broken and disasbled for more than a year before the disaster, and Exxon management knew it. It was just too expensive to fix and operate.

I learned of the senseless crippling of the ship's radar while working for the Natives as a spill investigator. For the Chugach, this discovery was poignantly ironic. On their list of safety demands in return for Valdez was "state-of-the-art" on-ship radar.

We discovered more, but because of the labyrinthine ways of litigation, little became public, especially about the reckless acts of the industry consortium, Alyeska, which controls the Alaska Pipeline.

  • Several smaller oil spills before the Exxon Valdez could have warned of a system breakdown. But a former Senior Lab Technician with Alyeska, Erlene Blake, told our investigators that management routinely ordered her to toss out test samples of water evidencing spilled oil. She was ordered to refill the test tubes with a bucket of clean sea water called, "The Miracle Barrel."
  • In a secret meeting in April 1988, Alyeska Vice-President T.L. Polasek confidentially warned the oil group executives that, because Alyeska had never purchased promised safety equipment, it was simply "not possible" to contain an oil spill past the Valdez Narrows -- exactly where the Exxon Valdez ran aground 10 months later.
  • The Natives demanded (and law requires) that the shippers maintain round- the-clock oil spill response teams. Alyeska hired the Natives, especiallly qualified by their generations-old knowledge of the Sound, for this emergency work. They trained to drop from helicopters into the water with special equipment to contain an oil slick at a moments notice. But in 1979, quietly, Alyeska fired them all. To deflect inquisitive state inspectors, the oil consortium created sham teams, listing names of oil terminal workers who had not the foggiest idea how to use spill equipment which, in any event, was missing, broken or existed only on paper.

In 1989, when the oil poured from the tanker, there was no Native response team, only chaos.

Today, ten years after the oil washed over the Chugach beaches, you can kick over a rock and it will smell like an old gas station.

The Fable of the Drunken Captain serves the oil industry well. It falsely presents America's greatest environmental disaster as a tale of
human frailty, a one-time accident. But broken radar, missing equipment, phantom spill teams, faked tests -- the profit-driven disregard of the law -- made the spill an inevitability, not an accident.

Yet Big Oil tells us, as they plead to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, it can't happen again.

They promise.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Beetlejuice in Transformers 2?



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via /Film by orfilms@gmail.com (slashfilm.com) on 6/24/08

Lester "Beetlejuice" Green has supposedly been spotted on the Princeton set of Transformers: Rise of the Fallen. Many people know the little man with the even smaller head as one of the members of the Wack Pack on the Howard Stern Show. And anyone who reads the site knows I'm a huge Stern fan from wayyyy back (he gets me through my blogging day). There was a casting call for "a male little person, any ethnicity, age between 30 and 65." Green (seen behind Michael Bay in the photo above) has appeared on the big screen before, in 2001's Scary Movie 2 and Bubble Boy. Could he be making a cameo in Transformers 2, or is he just visiting the set?

PhillyFilmGirl also captured video of Frenzy attacking a car. Check it out after the jump.

source: TFLive

Related Stories:


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Think Progress » Bush’s approval hits new low: 23 percent.

Think Progress » Bush’s approval hits new low: 23 percent.

Chicago Business News, Analysis & Articles | AG Madigan to sue Countrywide Financial for fraud | Crain's

Chicago Business News, Analysis & Articles | AG Madigan to sue Countrywide Financial for fraud | Crain's

(Crain’s) — Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is suing Countrywide Financial Corp., claiming that the company knowingly put borrowers in mortgages they couldn’t afford leading to thousands of residents losing their homes.

The suit, scheduled to be filed Wednesday morning in Cook County Circuit Court, charges Countrywide with one count of fraud and deceptive business practices and one count of violating the Illinois Fairness in Lending Act.

Also named in the suit were co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Home Loans Inc., Full Spectrum Lending and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing L.P.

A Countrywide representative was not available for comment.

Countrywide Financial Corp., based in Calabasas, Calif., is the nation’s largest mortgage lender. It was also the largest mortgage lender in Illinois in 2004, 2005 and 2006, according to the suit.

Ms. Madigan’s accusations stem from an investigation she began in September. At that time, her office subpoenaed Countrywide’s home loan unit for documents and records related to loan originations and funding.

Crooks and Liars » Hoyer’s Conservative Capitulation Lifetime Award

Crooks and Liars » Hoyer’s Conservative Capitulation Lifetime Award

In the pages of “Drudge Daily”–better known as The Politico—they write a mind-boggling article on the FISA bill, Blue America and the hero role Hoyer played to get a bill passed for the minority party and Bush. Not even a mention as to why we’re all so opposed to the bill. That’s not important to the Drudge Daily.

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) called the House bill a “capitulation.” Salon.com’s Glenn Greenwald called Hoyer an “evil, craven enabler of the Bush administration.” Firedoglake.com blogger Jane Hamsher — delivering the lowest possible blow from the liberal blogosphere — declared Hoyer “the new Joe Lieberman.”

Hoyer knew it was coming, and he persevered anyway. That he did so speaks volumes about who he is: a master of cloakroom politics who can use his friendships across the aisle to strike deals, even if others demand that his party hew closer to the positions that put it in power in 2006.

It’s better for Breshnahan and O’Conner to quote some comments of anger instead of dealing with the issue itself and why we are fighting back.

Digby:

Do read the whole Politico article, which doesn’t bother to spend even one paragraph describing why people were opposed to the bill. For that matter it doesn’t bother to tell us why the other side was so adamant that it get passed either. The fact that it wasn’t some typical congressional agenda item which might naturally be “horse traded” but rather a matter of fundamental constitutional principle, isn’t worth mentioning. Even the fact that the whole thing stinks to high heaven of financial corruption gets no mention.

What we have instead is the portrait of a Village hero, the ultimate master of the only game that matters — ostentatiously capitulating to conservatism. It’s the biggest accolade a Democrat ever gets, like winning a congressional Oscar, and the preening Hoyer is happy to make his acceptance speech in the pages of the Drudge Daily. This one is sweeter than most because he managed to capitulate to the congressional minority and the most unpopular president in history on an issue of fundamental constitutional principle which contained little political risk to uphold. A truly bravura performance. In fact, it’s worthy of a lifetime achievement award.

Donate here to Blue America’s FISA Accountability fund so that we can continue to assure that Steny’s constituents are aware of his great triumph.

We have raised $311,977.00 so far. That is amazing and the Villagers and Hoyer took notice. Do you think he liked to see his face in the pages of the Washington Post?

Truthdig - Ear to the Ground - Justice Dept. Cherry-Picked Conservatives

Truthdig - Ear to the Ground - Justice Dept. Cherry-Picked Conservatives

Here’s another outrage that has stumbled out in the twilight of George W. Bush: Under the leadership of John Ashcroft and, especially, Alberto Gonzales, the Justice Department illegally sought to hire conservative lawyers, according to a preliminary report from the department’s own inspector general.

New York Times:

Applications that contained what were seen as “leftist commentary” or “buzz words” like environmental and social justice were often grounds for rejecting applicants, according to e-mails reviewed by the inspector general’s office. Membership in liberal organizations like the American Constitution Society, Greenpeace, or the Poverty and Race Research Action Council were also seen as negative marks.

Affiliation with the Federalist Society, a prominent conservative group, was viewed positively.

Representative John Conyers Jr., the Michigan Democrat who heads the House Judiciary Committee, saw the report as affirmation that the Justice Department had crossed the line in “putting politics where it doesn’t belong.”

Read more

OpenCongress - Congress Gossip Blog

OpenCongress - Congress Gossip Blog

Teleocom Immunity and Telecom Money

June 24, 2008 - by Donny Shaw

MAPLight.org:

“On March 14 of this year the House passed an amendment that rejected retroactive immunity for phone carriers who helped the National Security Agency carry out the illegal wiretapping program without proper warrants. Ninety-four House Democrats voted in favor of this measure-rejecting immunity-on March 14, then ‘changed’ to vote in favor of the June 20 House billapproving immunity.

“Why did these ninety-four House members have a change of heart?” asked Daniel Newman, executive director of MAPLight.org, “Their constituents deserve answers.”

MAPLight, which connects vote patterns with campaign contributions, sees evidence that it’s linked to telecom money. Their report shows that the 94 Democrats who changed their vote in the three months from opposing telecom immunity to supporting it received almost twice as much in contributions from Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint.

Now, the votes were on two different bills, so this is not proof of vote buying and Representatives can deny the influence of money on their voting decision. But as Lawrence Lessig of Change Congress said this morning at the Personal Democracy Forum, when constituents see pattern like this, how could they believe otherwise. The appearance of corruption is about as important as actual corruption for the purpose of strengthening democracy.

Political Affairs Magazine - Disaster Threatens Black Sea

Political Affairs Magazine - Disaster Threatens Black Sea
Strasbourg, France, June 24 (Prensa Latina) – The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe stated today the Black Sea is seriously threatened by an ecological disaster of unpredictable consequences.

Water contamination, indiscriminate exploitation, spillage of toxic substances and eutrophication (increase in the concentration of nutrients in fresh water), are the main causes of the looming natural catastrophe.

According to the text, the first step to be taken is to encourage riverside States to intensify cooperation, that is, Georgia, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey.

Feingold Says House Should Not Impeach for an Impeachable Offense Because the House Doesn't Want to Do It | AfterDowningStreet.org

Feingold Says House Should Not Impeach for an Impeachable Offense Because the House Doesn't Want to Do It | AfterDowningStreet.org

Clubland Vol.13 2CD (2008)



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via BeNolSatuEm by noreply@blogger.com (b01m) on 6/24/08


Clubland Vol.13 2CD (2008)

Tracklist:
----------

CD1

1. Cascada Because the Night
2. N Force with Darren Styles Right By Your Side
3. Rihanna Take a Bow (Haji & Emmanuel Remix)
4. Chicane v Natasha Bedingfield Bruised Water (Micha Daniels Club Mix)
5. Duffy Mercy (Gareth Wyn Remix)
6. Gusto Disco's Revenge 2008 (Freemasons Mix)
7. Wideboys feat. Shaznay Lewis Daddy O
8. Coone and Ghost Pitch Up
9. Kindervater feat. Nadja Everytime You Need Me
10. Cahill feat Nikki Belle Trippin on You
11. Sam Sparro Black & Gold (Sanna & Pitron Remix)
12. Flip and Fill feat. Lara McAllen Like Me (Fugitive mix)
13. R.I.O. Shine On (Spencer & Hill Remix)
14. Frisco v Corona Rhythm of the Night (Styles and Breeze Mix)
15. Will.I.Am feat. Cheryl Cole Heartbreaker (House Mix)
16. K-Klass Getting Ready
17. Maximum Spell I See You
18. Groove Coverage God is a Girl
19. Hypasonic & Jorg Schmidt Doesn't Matter
20. Soulja Boy Crank Dat (Fulfillment Mix)
21. Girls Aloud Megamix

CD2

1. Scooter Jumping All Over the World
2. Ultrabeat vs Darren Styles Discolights
3. De-Grees vs The Real Booty Babes Apologise
4. Manian Hold Me Tonight
5. Eyeopener Singin' Dam Di Da Doo
6. H 'Two' O What's It Gonna Be
7. Daddy DJ Daddy DJ (Beatfreakz Remix)
8. Rob Mayth Heart to Heart (Manian Mix)
9. Jay Sean Ride It (Sunship Mix)
10. Party Squad vs RMX Crew feat. Gio I'm Sorry (Jorg Schmid Mix)
11. Katie Jewels Burning Love
12. BBP Candy Floss
13. Wifi feat. Siobhan Gallagher Last Night (Hypasonic Mix)
14. Micky Modelle v Samantha Mumba Gotta Tell You (Ultrabeat Mix)
15. Melanie Flash One in a Million
16. Alex C feat. Y-ass Sweetest Ass in the World (Scooter Mix)
17. BCD v Clubstar Bridge Over Troubled Water
18. Dyce Tomorrow Can Wait (Cascada Mix)
19. Beat Players feat. Lara McAllen Piece of Heaven
20. Whelan & Di Scala Never Let Go
21. The Blackout Crew Put A Donk On It

Download
part 1
part 2
Part 3

BeNolSatuEm


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Dodd and Feingold to Filibuster Telecom Immunity - Now What's Obama's Excuse? And the Other 97 Senators? | AfterDowningStreet.org

Dodd and Feingold to Filibuster Telecom Immunity - Now What's Obama's Excuse? And the Other 97 Senators? | AfterDowningStreet.org

From Dodd and Feingold:

“This is a deeply flawed bill, which does nothing more than offer retroactive immunity by another name. We strongly urge our colleagues to reject this so-called ‘compromise’ legislation and oppose any efforts to consider this bill in its current form. We will oppose efforts to end debate on this bill as long as it provides retroactive immunity for the telecommunications companies that may have participated in the President’s warrantless wiretapping program, and as long as it fails to protect the privacy of law-abiding Americans.

“If the Senate does proceed to this legislation, our immediate response will be to offer an amendment that strips the retroactive immunity provision out of the bill. We hope our colleagues will join us in supporting Americans’ civil liberties by opposing retroactive immunity and rejecting this so-called ‘compromise’ legislation.”

cryptogon.com » Archives » House Energy and Commerce Committee Testemony: Gas Could Fall to $2 if Congress Imposed Limits on Speculators; Speculation

cryptogon.com » Archives » House Energy and Commerce Committee Testemony: Gas Could Fall to $2 if Congress Imposed Limits on Speculators; Speculation Now Accounts for About 70% of Al

It is absolute madness that commodities are bought and sold using leveraged vehicles in markets that allow participation by speculators; individuals and organizations who have no interest or connection to the underlying physical commodity.

Cryptogon, March 21, 2008

You know, I wrote something that turned out to be wrong in that piece above:

Pigs (Pork Bellies?) will fly before anyone takes my suggestion seriously.

I never, in my wildest dreams, thought that Congress would even look at this, much less consider doing anything about it! I guess lots of things become possible when the wheels are coming off the cart.

Now, the Market Watch piece below is interesting, indeed. It mentions some key Bush administration officials who reject the notion that speculators are playing a substantial role in driving up oil prices:

Both Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman have dismissed the impact of speculators on prices paid by consumers.

Anyone who “dismisses” the role of speculators in this shakedown is either stupid, or in on the scam. Hank Paulson and Samuel Bodman aren’t stupid. So…

Let’s take a quick walk through the revolving door to see what Henry Paulson and Samuel Bodman did before taking their jobs as high government officials.

Henry Paulson was formerly the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs. Well, well, well. Hank might have us believe that the Tooth Fairy has more to do with the price of oil than speculators. I mean, what possible impact could a firm with more black boxes than DARPA and some of the deepest pockets on Wall Street have on leveraged commodity markets? Meh! Fuggetaboutit.

How about Samuel Bodman? He’s the former President and Chief Operating Officer of Fidelity Investments and the former Director of the Fidelity Group of Mutual Funds. You know, Fidelity, that little mom and pop operation with $1.57 trillion of assets under management as of September 2007

Perish the thought that speculators would have anything to do with this oil situation! How could anyone suggest such a stupid thing!?

Via: Market Watch:

The price of retail gasoline could fall by half, to around $2 a gallon, within 30 days of passage of a law to limit speculation in energy-futures markets, four energy analysts told Congress on Monday.

Testifying to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Michael Masters of Masters Capital Management said that the price of oil would quickly drop closer to its marginal cost of around $65 to $75 a barrel, about half the current $135.

Fadel Gheit of Oppenheimer & Co., Edward Krapels of Energy Security Analysis and Roger Diwan of PFC Energy Consultants agreed with Masters’ assessment at a hearing on proposed legislation to limit speculation in futures markets.

Krapels said that it wouldn’t even take 30 days to drive prices lower, as fund managers quickly liquidated their positions in futures markets.

“Record oil prices are inflated by speculation and not justified by market fundamentals,” according to Gheit. “Based on supply and demand fundamentals, crude-oil prices should not be above $60 per barrel.”

Futures trading in London has not been a major factor in rising oil prices, testified Sir Bob Reid, chairman of the Chairman of London-based ICE Futures Europe. Rising prices are largely a function of fundamental supply and demand, not manipulation or speculation, he said.

“Energy speculation has become a growth industry and it is time for the government to intervene,” said Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., chairman of the full committee. “We need to consider a full range of options to counter this rapacious speculation.” It was Dingell’s strongest statement yet on the role of speculators.

Dingell introduced a bill on June 11 that would ask the Energy Department to gather the facts on energy prices, including the role played by speculators.

There are two kinds of speculators in the futures markets, Masters said. Traditional speculators are those who need to hedge because they actually take physical possession of the commodities. Index speculators, on the other hand, are merely allocating a portion of their portfolio to commodity futures.
Index speculation damages price-discovery mechanisms provided by futures markets, Masters added
The committee will likely consider legislation that would rein in index speculation by imposing higher-margin requirements; setting position limits for speculators; requiring more disclosure of positions; and preventing pension funds and investment banks from owning commodities.

Both major presidential candidates have supported closing loopholes that encourage speculation in the energy markets. Read more on Election Blog.

However, other witnesses said that pure speculators have had little impact on energy prices, which have doubled in the past year to about $135 per barrel. Both Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman have dismissed the impact of speculators on prices paid by consumers.

Speculators now account for about 70% of all benchmark crude trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange, up from 37% in 2000, said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the investigations subcommittee. Stupak introduced a bill on Friday that would limit index speculation.

There has been much discussion recently about how big a role speculators have been playing in the sharp rise in energy prices, though no consensus has emerged on this point.

Congress, however, has grown increasingly concerned over speculative investors’ role in the energy market in comparison with those buying futures contracts to hedge against risk from price changes. Lawmakers are expected to consider legislation to set strict limits — or in some cases, an outright ban — on speculative trading in energy futures in some markets.

Dingell is looking into any legal loopholes that may have contributed to speculation in energy markets. In 1991, according to documents provided by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to the committee’s investigators, the agency authorized the first exemption from position limits for swap dealers with no physical commodity exposure. This began what Dingell said was “a process that has enabled investment banks to accumulate enormous positions in commodity markets.”

Is Congress barking up the wrong tree?

Neal Ryan, manager at Ryan Oil & Gas Partners, said that if Congress develops regulations to cut back speculative trading, speculation will just find a new home.

“Speculation is the root of capitalism,” he said. “If the speculation is forced out of the U.S. exchanges, it’ll simply show up on other exchanges that are OTC like the ICE, or new exchanges will pop up to allow for the spec trades to continue functioning.”

Ryan said he does see a reason for Congress to look at eliminating aspects such as allowing West Texas intermediate crude oil futures to trade on foreign markets and the “Enron loophole,” but “these exchanges are currently functioning as they are supposed to in a free marketplace.”

The creation of a comprehensive U.S. energy policy that tackles issues of increasing domestic supply and reining in consumer demand via conservation should be Congress’ focus, Ryan said. “Instead we’re on bended knee begging the Saudis to put more oil on the market and talking about shutting down spec trades.”

cryptogon.com » Archives » Los Angeles: More People Living Out of Their Cars

cryptogon.com » Archives » Los Angeles: More People Living Out of Their Cars

Fox Analyst: Iraqis ‘Owe Us’ 100-Year Leases On Their Oil, ‘We Ought To Take...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Think Progress by Guest on 6/24/08

Last week, the New York Times reported that four Western oil companies — Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total, and BP — are in the final stages of negotiating no-bid oil contracts "to service Iraq's largest fields." These contracts would run for one to two years, and give the oil companies a "foothold" in bidding on future contracts.

But one-to-two year service contracts aren't enough for analyst Bob Beckel, a Fox News liberal. On the O'Reilly Factor last night, Beckel said that "what we ought to do is get Iraq to give us a 100 year lease" for exploring their oil fields:

BECKEL: OK, now, what we ought to do is get Iraq to give us 100 year lease on their unexplored — they're the second largest source of oil in the world. Known reserves. Give the United States oil companies 100 year leases. Let us explore. We can get it quickly. It's through sand. It's the fastest way to get oil.

Beckel justified giving U.S. oil companies a century of business in Iraq by claiming, "The Iraqis owe us, Bill. We ought to take it." Watch it:


As the New York Times notes, such no-bid contracts play into the suspicions of those who believe that the U.S. invaded Iraq "precisely to secure the oil wealth these contracts seek to extract." It's uncertain what role the U.S. played in negotiating the four no-bid contracts.

If U.S. companies were given 100-year leases like Beckel wants, more people would likely agree with former Centcom Commander John Abizaid's 2007 claim about the war in Iraq: "Of course it's about oil."

Pat Garofalo


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

What a Non-Neutral Internet Looks Like -- Let's Go to the Video | Public Knowledge

What a Non-Neutral Internet Looks Like -- Let's Go to the Video | Public Knowledge

11 Cheap Generic Drug Programs That Will Save You Money [Cheap Generic Drugs]



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 6/24/08

Here at the Consumerist we'd like you to save money. That's why we've put together a handy list of those $4 generic drug programs that you've been hearing about. We hope this list will make it easier for you to locate the store that has the best deal on all your medications. If your local grocery store is doing a similar program and we missed it, please add a link to the comments. If you need help researching the medicines, we recommend Consumer Reports' excellent site Best Buy Drugs. Enjoy!

Store & Drug List
Deal
Wal-Mart
$4 30 Day/ $10 90 Day
Target
$4 30 Day/ $10 90 Day
Dominick's/Safeway
$4 Generics
Kroger
$4 30 Day/ $10 90 Day
Fred Meyer
$4 30 Days/ $10 90 Days
Giant Foods
$9.99 90 Days
Ralphs
$4 30 Days/ $10 90 Days
QFC
$4 30 Days/ $10 90 Days
Meijer
Free Antibiotics (w/Prescription)
Kmart
$15 90 Days
Walgreens
$12.99 30 days

(Photo: Ben Popken )



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Overdraft Fees Are Trapping Consumers On Social Security In A Cycle Of Debt ...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 6/24/08

The Center For Responsible Lending has put together a report that examines the disastrous effect of overdraft fees on Americans who depend on Social Security for all or part of their income. Despite the fact that they've had checking accounts all their lives (and presumably know what they're doing), each year older Americans pay 4.5 billion dollars in overdraft fees— and on average they actually pay more in fees than they receive in credit when the overdraft is triggered by a debit card transaction.

The average debit card transaction triggering an overdraft is for a $26 purchase. For this transaction,the bank makes an average loan of $19.95, or the amount overdrafted, and charges an average fee of $33 for each incident. This amounts to an average of $1.65 in fees per dollar borrowed. Thus, older adults pay more in fees than they receive in credit for the average debit card purchase triggering an overdraft.

Since Social Security payments are disbursed only once a month, a consumer on Social Security can rack up substantial daily balance fees waiting for her next check— trapping her in a cycle of overdraft fees and debt that's eerily similar to a payday loan scenario. If the consumers on Social Security were instead given a line of credit they could avoid this cycle of debt.

The Center for Responsible Lending illustrates this difference by sharing the story of Mary, a real consumer entirely dependent on Social Security:

Mary begins the year 2006 with $420.56 in her checking account, held at a large national bank. She makes a $380 ATM withdrawal and several smaller point-of-sale purchases on January 3, comes up short, and is overdrawn by January 4. She incurs a $34 overdraft fee for the initial overdraft. After two more purchases, and two more overdraft fees, she finds herself almost $200 below zero on January 9. For the next eleven days, Mary doesn't spend any money from her checking account, but her checking account loses money, nonetheless. Her bank charges her a fee of $7 a day because of her ongoing negative balance. By the time a scheduled electronic withdrawal is made to pay a bill for $32.38 on January 20, Mary's account is overdrawn by more than $300, and the bank rejects the transaction. Her bill goes unpaid, although the bank continues to charge daily negative-balance fees.

Finally, on January 25, Mary receives her monthly Social Security check of $904. However, her account is already $335 overdrawn and she still has an additional $500 in expenses for the month. Once these payments are made, Mary only has $31.09 left to live on until her next Social Security check comes in late February. Because of this, Mary almost immediately has a negative checking account balance again, once she makes three small ($20 or less) purchases on February 1. Over the next two days, Mary incurs two overdraft fees because of these purchases and conducts another transaction for $50, which also results in an overdraft.

Mary does not make any more purchases between February 8 and February 17. However, the bank again continues to charge her a fee of $7 a day because of her ongoing negative balance. On February 18, an automatic bill payment causes Mary's account to go even farther into the red—a transaction that the bank approves even though her account is already below zero and she cannot even repay the $7 daily negative balance fee. Once Mary's account dips to $314.91 below zero, the bank finally begins to refuse additional transactions, rejecting a utility bill for another month. The $7 daily negative balance fees continue to be assessed through February 21.

Finally, on February 22, Mary's Social Security check comes in, and the account balance ends up above $400 once the bank subtracts the overdraft fees. Unfortunately, because Mary still has to pay her end of the month expenses totaling about $410, she is left with only $18.48 to tide her over until the end of March. This meager sum—even less than the $31.09 she had to make ends meet after being charged for overdrafts in February—virtually guarantees that Mary will continue to remain trapped in a cycle of accumulating overdraft fees month after month. In January and February, Mary paid $448 in overdraft fees in return for receiving $210.25 in credit from her bank, and was forced to live on $20 from a Social Security check of nearly $1,000. If Mary's bank had instead offered her an 18 percent APR line of credit to cover overdrafts, she would have only paid about $1 in total fees for her overdrafts.

As you can see in the graph above, if Mary would have been offered a line of credit, she would have ended up with $420 at the end of two months and would have been able to pay her utility bills.

The Center for Responsible Lending is working to stop banks from being able to automatically drain Social Security funds from checking accounts, but the important takeaway for us is this: It's important that you or your family consider switching to a bank that allows you to link a savings account or offers a less expensive line of credit so that you can avoid these fees — particularly if you or your loved ones are retired and on a fixed income. There will likely be a fee for this service, but when you consider the alternative, it may be a wise choice.

Here's some basic information about overdraft protection from Bankrate. You can also compare accounts and overdraft fees with Bankrate's checking account finder.

Shredded SecurityOverdraft practices drain fees from older Americans (PDF) [Center For Responsible Lending via CL&P Blog]
(Photo: michael.kinne )



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Chicagoist: Midwest Floods To Send Already Rising Food Costs Soaring

Chicagoist: Midwest Floods To Send Already Rising Food Costs Soaring

The recent floods and cresting rivers in the Midwest are going to have an adverse effect on our pocketbooks. With over two million acres of corn and soybean fields under water and futures prices for corn already at record highs (thanks, ethanol production!), the floods are sending prices for soy and corn flying through the roof on trading floors around the world.

The flooded farmland is also forcing livestock farms to cut back on the amount they normally raise, which will lead to higher prices for beef, pork, and poultry. There are fears that the it could also mean higher prices on turkeys and hams during the holidays. [Crain's, NPR]

Dealbreaker - A Wall Street Tabloid - Business News Headlines and Financial Gossip - Sarbanes-Oxley: Conning Investors Into Trusting Corporate America

Dealbreaker - A Wall Street Tabloid - Business News Headlines and Financial Gossip - Sarbanes-Oxley: Conning Investors Into Trusting Corporate America: "We've said before that the ideology of Investor Confidence is dangerous: it can lead to policies intended to instill an unwarranted confidence in the stock market. This divergence between effect on ethics and effect on confidence is good reminder that you can't spell 'Investor Confidence' with a 'con.' Who says you can't put lipstick on a pig?

Survey: CEOs view Sarbanes-Oxley as ineffective, burdensome [George State University via Sox First]"

Dealbreaker - A Wall Street Tabloid - Business News Headlines and Financial Gossip - Housing Bailout Bill Moves Closer To Senate Approval

Dealbreaker - A Wall Street Tabloid - Business News Headlines and Financial Gossip - Housing Bailout Bill Moves Closer To Senate Approval

The bill to that has been derided as the "Bank of America bailout" is pushing forward on Capitol Hill. This morning the bill got the sixty votes needed to limit debate, ending any possibility for a filibuster against it.

A vote on the bill, which may actually have been written by Bank of America lobbyists, is expected as early as tomorrow. It will likely pass the Senate. President George Bush has vowed to veto the bill.

The bill would create a multi-billion dollar mortgage refinancing fund, providing a huge financial windfall to mortgage lenders with risky loans. Countrywide, the nation's largest mortgage lender, was recently acquired by Bank of America. Banking committee chairman Chris Dodd, who sponsored the bill, has come under fire for accepting sweetheart loans from Countrywide. Bank of America executives have recently contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his campaign fund.

But you know what? That old saw about watching laws getting made doesn't apply. This isn't like watching sausages getting made. Not at all. It's more like watching their post-digestion disposal.

Think Progress » FLASHBACK: McCain Declared Osama Bin Laden Threats Are ‘Very Helpful’ To Bush’s Campaign

Think Progress » FLASHBACK: McCain Declared Osama Bin Laden Threats Are ‘Very Helpful’ To Bush’s Campaign
Yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) sought to distance himself from adviser Charlie Black, who told Fortune Magazine that another terrorist attack on the United States would be “a big advantage” to McCain’s campaign. McCain rejected the comments, saying, “If he said that, and I do not know the context, I strenuously disagree.”

However, McCain himself has made similar assertions in the past. In 2004, just three days before the presidential election, McCain argued that a recently-released video-tape by Osama bin Laden would prove “very helpful to President Bush”:

U.S. Sen. John McCain, campaigning in southwestern Connecticut on Saturday, said Osama bin Laden’s video message to Americans will likely energize President Bush’s re-election campaign.

I think it’s very helpful to President Bush,” said McCain, R-Ariz., while stumping in Stamford for U.S. Rep. Christopher Shays. “It focuses America’s attention on the war on terrorism. I’m not sure if it was intentional or not, but I think it does have an effect.” [AP, 10/30/04]

In the 18-minute video, bin Laden declared that al Qaeda was still motivated to attack the United States again.

More recently, McCain indicated that the terrorist attack that killed Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto would help him politically, as CNN’s Dana Bash recounted on the Situation Room yesterday:

BASH: I was actually with Sen. McCain the very day that Benazir Bhutto was assassinated. … He really did understand from that moment that this was something that he thought could help him in the race at that point to be the Republican nominee. In fact, at that event that very day I asked Sen. McCain if he thought it would help his political campaign and he said pretty much “Yes.” … So it’s not a secret that back then that Sen. McCain and his campaign thought it would help.

To be sure — unlike Black seemed to do — McCain in 2004 was not advocating a terrorist attack. Yet just like his trusted adviser, McCain — who claimed yesterday he “cannot imagine” why Black would say such a thing — has not hesitated to claim political advantage from acts of terror.

Think Progress » Elizabeth Edwards: McCain’s individual market for health insurance discriminates against women.

Think Progress » Elizabeth Edwards: McCain’s individual market for health insurance discriminates against women.

Writing at the Wonk Room today, Elizabeth Edwards, a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, points out that the individual market for health care — as advocated by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) — would discriminate against women. Edwards explains that health care insurers “‘rate-up’ my insurance bill for not only my status as a breast cancer patient, but also my gender,” noting that women are forced to pay more for health insurance:

The point is that the insurers have given us just another example about how the individual market is fundamentally broken. Embracing it as the solution to our health crisis – as the McCain plan proposes to – will only make matters worse.

Read her full post at the Wonk Room.

Police: Clinic workers imprisoned patient who couldn't pay | ajc.com

Police: Clinic workers imprisoned patient who couldn't pay | ajc.com: "Staffers at a Duluth medical practice shuttered their office Friday amid charges of false imprisonment for allegedly locking a patient in a room when concerns arose about her ability to pay the bill.

Dr. John Drew Laurusonis and office assistants Leslie Ann York and Alexander Acquah of the Doctors Medical Center were indicted this week. The three face arraignment July 3 on the charge."

Chase Bank Teller Allegedly Fleeces 86-Year-Old Out Of More Than $300,000 In...



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 6/24/08

A Chase Bank teller who befriended an 86-year-old senior allegedly fleeced the women out of most of her $400,000 in savings, says the Chicago Sun-Times, and even though the bank caught the teller and fired her... they're taking a long time to repay the stolen money.

The public guardian's office was put in charge of Jessie McDonald's affairs after a doctor found that she was suffering from dementia. They claim that Chase is preying on a vulnerable consumer by not repaying the stolen money in a timely fashion: "This [teller] was helping herself to about $300,000,'' Public Guardian Robert Harris said. "It's even more egregious when it's someone who is completely reliant on her savings. She is so vulnerable. You would not expect the bank would be the one preying on her at this point.''

Chase says that they were the ones who caught the teller in the first place, and that they're working to return the money:"We . . . urged them to intercede on behalf of Mrs. McDonald, and we are currently working with the public guardian's office to resolve the financial details,'' Chase spokesman Tom Kelly said.

Mrs. McDonald owns a townhome in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago, but is currently living at Crestwood Care Centre in Crestwood, IL. Her bills are being paid from her savings, but she's running out of funds. In order to move home, her townhome will need extensive renovations and she'll need 24-hour care. In short, she needs her life savings back or she may end up on public assistance.

The Sun-Times says that there's currently an FBI investigation taking place, but the teller hasn't been charged criminally. Mrs. McDonald now understands what happened to her and she says she's disappointed.

"You trust somebody. She was so nice. And I wasn't thinking," McDonald told the Sun-Times. "I was really disappointed in her."

'She was so nice' [Chicago Sun-Times](Thanks, Ellen!)
(Photo: epicharmus )



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

t r u t h o u t | Congressional Resolution Demands Bush Act on Iran

t r u t h o u t | Congressional Resolution Demands Bush Act on Iran: "A non-binding resolution to demand that President Bush impose 'stringent inspection requirements' on trade with Iran - language that leaves the door open for a military blockade - will likely come to the House floor this week, according to sources close to Congressional leadership. The legislation, H.Con.Res.362, which is paralleled by a similar Senate bill, has gained bipartisan support rapidly, with more co-sponsors signing on by the day. Once it hits the floor, it's bound to 'pass like a hot knife through butter,' a staffer in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office told Chelsea Mozen of the nonprofit Just Foreign Policy.

Trita Parsi, co-founder and president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), concurred, saying passage may happen as early as Tuesday.

'This bill will likely be put on the floor under suspension - meaning that it will pass without even a vote,' Parsi told Truthout.

Bills placed under rules of suspension are usually uncontroversial. However, this one is an ominous exception, according to Parsi.

'It sets the stage for a very dangerous escalation,' he said."

Will the Real John McCain Please Stand Up



 
 

Sent to you by irie1972 via Google Reader:

 
 

via Scholars and Rogues by E Rocha on 6/24/08

In an effort to win back lost Hispanic votes, Republican presidential hopeful, Senator John McCain held a closed door meeting with more than 100 Hispanic leaders in Chicago. However, things did not turn out as he hoped.

Blogger Matt Ortega reports that the event was attended by Rosanna Pulido, State Director for the Illinois Minutemen Project, who was not too thrilled with McCain's double talk on immigration.

"I have friends in Washington, DC, on this issue," she says. "We've had conversations on this issue." After comprehensive immigration reform was killed in the Senate and McCain changed his rhetoric on the subject on the campaign trail, Pulido says, "we were hopeful after John McCain started saying, 'I understand where the American people are coming from, there's gotta be enforcement first,' we thought great, he's had a change of heart."

So she went to the meeting, a room full of 150-200 people. "Sure enough," Pulido says, "his mantra at the meeting was comprehensive immigration reform.' And there were cheers and applause whenever he mentioned comprehensive immigration reform."

"Then he said, 'I bet some of you don't know this — did you know Spanish was spoken in Arizona before English?' And the crowd roared. I was appalled," Pulido said. "He was pandering to these people — that's what they wanted to hear."

McCain knows he cannot win the election without the Latino vote. However, by pandering to his audience when it comes to immigration, John McCain is playing a dangerous game. One that will cost him the Latina/o vote come election day.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Dealbook - A ‘Bonfire’ Returns as Heartburn - NYTimes.com

Dealbook - A ‘Bonfire’ Returns as Heartburn - NYTimes.com
Almost exactly a year ago, Tom Wolfe, the author of “The Bonfire of the Vanities,” was wandering the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Dressed in his trademark white suit, he darted around traders and whisked past trading booths, shaking hands and waving, just before the market was about to open.

But the real excitement — the reason, traders whispered, that Mr. Wolfe must be