Saturday, March 14, 2009

"You. Are. Failing. There. Are. No. Bonuses. For. Failure."

from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/3/14/182519/797/258/708585

WaPo:

Despite receiving $170 billion in federal aid and recording a staggering loss for the last quarter, insurance giant American International Group is doling out tens of million of dollars in bonuses this week to senior employees.

Not good.

In a phone call on Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told AIG Chairman and chief executive Edward M. Liddy that the payments were unacceptable and needed to be renegotiated, according to an administration source.

The company has since agreed to change the terms of some of these payments.

Good!

But in a letter to Geithner, Liddy wrote that the bonuses could not be cancelled altogether because the firm would risk a lawsuit for breaching employment contracts. Liddy also expressed concerns about whether changing the bonuses would lead to an exodus of talented employees who are needed to turn the company around.

Not good. (Roll out the "retroactive immunity" template!)

Now for the punchline:

"We cannot attract and retain the best and brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses -- which are now being operated principally on behalf of the American taxpayers -- if employees believe that their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. treasury," Liddy wrote.

Are you sure you understand what "arbitrary" means, sir?

I'm not even sure you understand what "continued" means. Instead of having "continued" adjustments, how about we have just one: Do. Not. Pay. Any. More. Bonuses.

You. Are. Failing.

There. Are. No. Bonuses. For. Failure.

A.I.G. to Pay $100 Million in Bonuses After Huge Bailout from AfterDowningStreet.org

Despite being bailed out with more than $170 billion from the Treasury and Federal Reserve, the American International Group is preparing to pay about $100 million in bonuses to executives in the same business unit that brought the company to the brink of collapse last year.

An official in the Obama administration said Saturday that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner had called A.I.G.'s government-appointed chairman, Edward M. Liddy, on Wednesday and asked that the company renegotiate the bonuses.

Administration officials said they had managed to reduce some of the bonuses but had allowed most of them to go forward after the company's chief executive said A.I.G. was contractually obligated to pay them.

In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Mr. Liddy wrote: "Needless to say, in the current circumstances, I do not like these arrangements and find it distasteful and difficult to recommend to you that we must proceed with them."

The bonuses will be paid to executives at American International Group's Financial Products division, the unit that wrote trillions of dollars' worth of credit-default swaps that protected investors from defaults on bonds backed by subprime mortgages.

An A.I.G. spokeswoman said the company had no comment beyond the text of the letter.

In his letter to the Treasury, Mr. Liddy said A.I.G. hoped to reduce its retention bonuses for 2009 by 30 percent. He said the top 25 executives at the Financial Products division had also agreed to reduce their salary for the rest of 2009 to $1.

But Mr. Liddy defended the need to continue paying bonuses if A.I.G. was going to unwind the rest of its disastrous mortgage-related business at the lowest possible cost to taxpayers.

"We cannot attract and retain the best and the brightest talent to lead and staff the A.I.G. businesses — which are now being operated principally on behalf of American taxpayers — if employees believe their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury," he wrote Mr. Geithner. The government owns nearly 80 percent of the company.

The bonuses were first reported by The Washington Post.

Of all the financial institutions that have been propped up by taxpayer dollars, none has received more money than A.I.G. and none has infuriated lawmakers more with practices that policy makers have called reckless.

Mr. Liddy, whom Federal Reserve and Treasury officials recruited after A.I.G. faltered last September and received its first round of bailout money, said the bonuses and "retention pay" had been agreed to in early 2008 and were for the most part legally required.

The company told the Treasury that there were two categories of bonus payments, with the first to be given to senior executives. The administration official said Mr. Geithner had told A.I.G. to revise them to protect taxpayer dollars and tie future payments to performance.

The second group of bonuses cover some 2008 retention payments from contracts entered into before government involvement in A.I.G. that the company says it is legally obligated to fulfill. The official said Treasury concluded that those contracts could not be broken.

Indeed, in his letter to Mr. Geithner, Mr. Liddy wrote that he had shown the details of the $450 million bonus pool to outside lawyers and been told that A.I.G. had no choice but to follow through with the payment schedule.

A.I.G. did cut other bonuses, he explained in the letter, but those were part of the compensation for people who dealt in other parts of the company and had no direct involvement with the derivatives.

Ever since it was to be bailed out by the government last fall, A.I.G. has been defending itself against accusations that it was richly compensating people who caused what might be the biggest financial crisis in American history.

A.I.G.'s main business is insurance, but it had a unit called A.I.G. Financial Products that sold hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of derivatives — the notorious credit-default swaps that nearly toppled the entire company last fall.

In his letter to the Treasury, Mr. Liddy said that A.I.G. was required to pay about $165 million in bonuses on or before March 15. The company had already paid $55 million in December, but the rest was about to come due.

The bonus plan covers 400 employees, and the bonuses range from as little as $1,000 to as much as $6.5 million. About seven executives at the financial products unit were entitled to receive more than $3 million in bonuses.

Under a deal reached this week, A.I.G. agreed that the top 50 executives in the financial products division would get half of the $9.6 million they were supposed to get by March 15. The second of their bonuses would be paid out in two installments in July in September. To get those payments, Treasury officials said, A.I.G. would have to show that it had made progress toward its goal of selling off business units and repaying the government.

A.I.G. had set up a special bonus pool for the financial products unit early in 2008, before the company's near collapse, when problems stemming from the mortgage crisis were becoming clear and there were concerns that some of the best-informed derivatives specialists might leave. It locked in a total amount, $450 million, for the financial products unit and prepared to pay it in a series of installments, to encourage people to stay.

Only part of the payments had been made by last fall, when A.I.G. nearly collapsed. Another installment is due this month — to people who, it is now clear, were at the very heart of A.I.G.'s worldwide conflagration. The financial products unit is now being painstakingly wound down.


rest http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/40722

Friday, March 13, 2009

Jim Cramer’s Lesson for Phil Donahue from Firedoglake

FROM http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/13/jim-cramers-lesson-for-phil-donahue/

phil_donahue_on_fox.thumbnail.gifMaybe you're already sick of reading about Jon Stewart's posterizing of CNBC's Jim Cramer -- but in case you're not, Matt Yglesias makes a point that deserves echoing:

It's worth thinking a bit about the General Electric Corporations news media properties more generally. They hired Phil Donahue, and then fired him when he had the highest ratings on the network because they didn't like that he was against invading Iraq. . . . [Keith Olbermann's popularity] prompted a huge freakout from their big news stars like Tom Brokaw about how it was injuring their credibility to appear on a network that's cobranded with a network that features a liberal. Meanwhile, at their other cobranded network, CNBC, they have on air a bunch of frauds. . . . And when someone points the fraud out, the whole GE team circles the wagons to defend Jim Cramer and CNBC. Liberals? That wrecks their credibility. Liars and frauds? That's great. Go peacock!

As Yglesias concludes pessimistically, "Jon Stewart satirizing it doesn't really change anything." But I suppose it's helpful example if you're looking to prove to someone how in the so-called liberal media, the best job security lies in saying what rich people want to hear.

Stop Comrade Obama NOW!!! from Scholars and Rogues


SOMETHING MUST BE DONE TO STOP AMERICA'S DANGEROUS RUSH INTO THE ARMS OF SOCIALISM!!!! If Obama isn't stopped immediately he'll tax us all to death just like his SOCIALIST predecessors, Eisenhower and Nixon and Reagan and … errr, wait a minute….

REST AT http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/13/stop-comrade-obama-now/

Day care mistakes wiper fluid for koolaid



LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Ten children at an Arkansas day-care center drank windshield wiper fluid after the owner served it from a container mistaken for Kool-Aid and placed in a refrigerator, authorities said Friday. The day-care owner voluntarily surrendered her state license Friday.

Doctors estimate the children, ages 2 to 7, drank about an ounce of the blue fluid late Thursday afternoon before realizing it tasted wrong, said Laura James, a pediatric pharmacologist and toxicologist at Arkansas Children's Hospital in Little Rock.

Only one child remained hospitalized Friday in good condition, after blood samples showed "measurable levels" of methanol, a highly toxic alcohol that can induce comas and cause blindness, officials said. In moderate cases, it can cause nausea, vomiting, staggering and sleepiness, James said.

The day care also provided the fluid for testing.

The owner bought the windshield wiper fluid with several other items on a recent shopping trip, James told The Associated Press. "This product was mistakenly grabbed and thought to be Kool-Aid and put in the refrigerator," she said.

The day care's owner, Carolyn Bynum, was interviewed Friday by child welfare investigators and gave up her license, said Julie Munsell, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Human Services. Bynum declined to comment to the AP, but Munsell said she accepted "total responsibility" for the incident.

"She was so upset about what had occurred and she was definitely worried some of the children had been injured," Munsell said. "It was just a mistake, she says. She says it was just a horrible mistake."

Bynum's license had allowed her to care for 10 children in her home in Scott, about 15 miles east of Little Rock. Munsell said Bynum had no found complaints or serious compliance issues since receiving the license in 2002.

By surrendering her license, Bynum can no longer care for the children without reapplying. State law requires a license when someone cares for more than five children from more than one family at the same time in their home.

REST http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090313/ap_on_re_us/windshield_fluid_sickness


Secret Treaty: Download Music, Go to Jail? from Crooks and Liars

REST AT http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/secret-treaty-download-music-go-jail

Marcy at FDL brings us this interesting tidbit that indicates you might be serving jail time for downloading music:

Last September, the Bush administration defended the unusual secrecy over an anti-counterfeiting treaty being negotiated by the U.S. government, which some liberal groups worry could criminalize some peer-to-peer file sharing that infringes copyrights.

[...] Now President Obama's White House has tightened the cloak of government secrecy still further, saying in a letter this week that a discussion draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and related materials are "classified in the interest of national security pursuant to Executive Order 12958."

[...] Jamie Love, director of the nonprofit group Knowledge Ecology International, filed the Freedom of Information Act request that resulted in this week's denial from the White House. The denial letter (PDF) was sent to Love on Tuesday by Carmen Suro-Bredie, chief FOIA officer in the White House's Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

[...] Love had written in his original request on January 31--submitted soon after Obama's inauguration--that the documents "are being widely circulated to corporate lobbyists in Europe, Japan, and the U.S. There is no reason for them to be secret from the American public."

[...] Love's group believes that the U.S. and Japan want the treaty to say that willful trademark and copyright infringement on a commercial scale must be subject to criminal sanctions, including infringement that has "no direct or indirect motivation of financial gain."

Safer than Before 9/11? Um, Not Really from Debbie Schlussel


By Debbie Schlussel

As I've repeatedly said on this site, we are NOT safer than before 9/11. We are LESS safe.

Here's yet another stellar example of how easy it is for terrorists to impersonate Americans and get the real--not fake--documents to prove it.

Attention, Terrorists:

Using phony documents and the identities of a dead man and a 5-year-old boy, a government investigator obtained U.S. passports in a test of post-9/11 security.

Despite efforts to boost passport security since the 2001 terror attacks, the investigator fooled passport and postal service employees four out of four times, according to a new report.

The ruses are detailed in a report being issued this week by the Government Accountability Office. A draft summary of the findings was obtained by The Associated Press.

In one instance, the investigator used the Social Security number of a man who died in 1965, a fake New York birth certificate and a fake Florida driver's license. He received a passport four days later.

In another attempt, the investigator used a 5-year-old boy's information but identified himself as 53 years old on the passport application. He received that passport seven days later.

In another test, the investigator used fake documents to get a genuine Washington D.C. identification card. He then used the card to apply for a passport and received it the same day.

In a fourth test, the investigator used a fake New York birth certificate and a fake West Virginia driver's license and got the passport eight days later.


REST AT http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2009/03/safer_than_befo.html

SC gov.: No stimulus for crumbling school



  • Story Highlights
  • Ty'Sheoma Bethea wrote letter to lawmakers asking for help in rebuilding her school
  • The letter made its way to the Oval Office and brought an extraordinary invitation
  • Ty'Sheoma sat next to the first lady at the president's "state of the nation" speech
  • But S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford says state stimulus money won't go to school projects
REST http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/13/school.stimulus/

Obama's Top Geek on Leave after Minion Charged with Seeking $6 Million in Bribes [Crime] from Gawker


Vivek Kundra, the White House's chief information officer, has been placed on leave after Yusuf Acar, a technology manager in the D.C. government who previously worked for Kundra, was arrested on bribery charges.

The investigation does not involve Kundra. The White House, in a statement, said Kundra's leave came from "an abundance of caution," after a series of embarrassments with Obama appointees.

Though Acar was a minor figure in the D.C. government's technology operations, he had authority over hardware and software budgets which, according to an FBI agent investigating the case, allowed him to conduct a wide-ranging bribery operation. The agent's affidavit has some grandiose quotes from Acar and his alleged accomplice, a D.C. tech executive named Sushil Bansal, which are worthy of deposed Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich. Maybe Acar will write a book, too? Here's the transcript of a phone conversation between Acar and a cooperating witness ("CW"):

rest at http://gawker.com/5169537/obamas-top-geek-on-leave-after-minion-charged-with-seeking-6-million-in-bribes

The Jim Cramer Indictment: Five More Counts [Loathsome] from Gawker

rest at http://gawker.com/5169531/the-jim-cramer-indictment-five-more-counts

Jim Cramer knows how easy CNBC is to fool. He used to play the network himself. Here are five episodes from the stock speculator's past that could use some dusting off.

Cramer avoided any career-ending gaffes on the Daily Show last night — like say, "when a performing monkey pundit does it that means that it is not illegal!" — but the extended drubbing and his squishy apologetic demeanor is a reminder that his 30-year-long career — as a trader, as a dot-com entrepreneur, and now as a screaming cable personality — has been little more than a running series of scandals and contretemps, rife with evidence that the TV personality has long made a habit of using his media profile for personal enrichment. The Stewart dust-up is far from the first time Cramer has run up against allegations of ethical misconduct. Here's the tangled history:

1. Stock-Picking at SmartMoney
In 1995, Cramer mentioned four stocks as good buys in his SmartMoney column, mentioning that he had a stake in one of them. In fact, his firm Cramer & Co. owned shares in all four, including 10 percent stakes in two of them. All four stocks shot up in value after the column ran. The SEC launched an informal investigation, and Dow Jones, which owned SmartMoney, announced a new ethics policy to prevent columnists from writing about securities they own. The magazine eventually took the blame for leaving out the disclosure. Two years later, Cramer told CNN that the episode "turned my life upside down... I now mention to everybody in the press because it could happen again; I don't want it to... It was a horrible incident. I live with it every day." Lesson learned!

2. Shorting WavePhone
In 1998, while co-hosting Squawk Box, Cramer said out loud on television that, prior to interviewing the CEO of a company called WavePhone that morning, he had shorted 25,000 shares of the company because he thought it was overvalued. Later in the same show, he went after the CEO, and WavePhone's stock dropped 38 percent, making Cramer slightly richer. He later claimed that it had been "a terrible choice of words" to say, "I called my stock-loan department and said, 'Listen, I want to short 25,000 WavePhore because I think this thing is a big speculative bubble." In fact, he said, he was just curious if anyone else was shorting the company. CNBC suspended him and the SEC investigated, but found no wrongdoing.

Just Go To Russia Already from Open Left - Front Page by Chris Bowers

FROM http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=12196

Memo to all you right-wingers talking about "Going Galt" by quitting your jobs and leaving the country: just friggin' do it already.

Give Russia a try. It is just the sort of right-wing, pro-private sector country with lots of wide open spaces that you would love.

You have destroyed five million jobs and are trying to cause another eight million people to lose their homes.  The jobs you quit, and the homes you leave, could be put to better use by the people who you made unemployed and homeless.

You titans of industry did such a bang-up job running the country, that I am sure we will struggle without you. However, it is no less than we deserve. After all, it was our own irresponsibility, not yours, that led to this crisis. We no longer deserve to share a country with people who are so utterly superior to us in every way.

If Russia isn't to your liking, and you would prefer a small island nation like the original John Galt, then maybe you could try Singapore. It is pretty right-wing and pro-capitalist. Give it a shot.

Besides, the only thing more irritating than people who are constantly threatening to leave the country but never actually leave are when people who actively destroyed the country are threatening to leave but never actually do.

So seriously, go back to Russia. You have no idea how long this left-winger has been waiting to tell you right-wingers to do that.

John Stewart and jim Kramer interview

http://crooksandliars.com/media/play/wmv/7552/26630

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Pentagon Knowingly Exposed Troops to Cancer-Causing Chemicals, Document Shows from AfterDowningStreet.org


Pentagon knowingly exposed troops to cancer-causing chemicals, document shows
John Byrne | Raw Story

A newly leaked military document appears to show the Pentagon knowingly exposed US troops to toxic chemicals that cause cancer, while publicly downplaying the risks exposure might cause.

The document, written by an environmental engineering flight commander in December of 2006 and posted on Wikileaks (PDF) on Tuesday, details the risks posed to US troops in Iraq by burning garbage at a US airbase. It enumerates myriad risks posed by the practice and identifies various carcinogens released by incinerating waste in open-air pits.

rest http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/40603

Monday, March 09, 2009

How To Opt-Out Of Verizon Selling Your Personal Information [Privacy] from Consumerist

FROM http://consumerist.com/5166729/how-to-opt+out-of-verizon-selling-your-personal-information

BoingBoing Gadgets says that Verizon has been mailing out a leaflet to its customers informing them that the company intends to sell their personal information unless they explicitly opt-out.

Apparently, it provides no instructions on how to do this other than by calling them — and BB gadgets says that customers are reporting that calling them is, well, ineffective.

In any case, they've figured how how to opt-out of the information selling, so if you'd like to opt-out, click here to learn how.

How to opt-out of Verizon's personal info-selling scheme [BB Gadgets] (Thanks, Ben!)

“Avoided Deforestation” Plan Gains Support from WorldChanginG


amazon_burning.jpg

Economist Nicholas Stern urged U.S. leaders to contribute to a Brazilian fund for conserving the Amazon during a visit to Washington, D.C., last week.

While visiting the White House and Capitol Hill, the former World Bank chief economist said the fund would help reduce Amazonian deforestation and also protect the region's ability to absorb greenhouse gas emissions.

"One of the best investments we can make is to put money in Brazil's Amazon Fund," Stern said at an event hosted by the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) on Thursday, repeating the advice he delivered to members of the Obama administration. "It's a good thing for development. It's a good thing for climate change."

Leaders from around the world have visited Washington in recent weeks to press Congress and the Obama administration to support international forest preservation projects as part of wider global efforts to tackle climate change.

Stern has previously supported the inclusion of "avoided deforestation" projects as part of international climate agreements - a policy known as Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, or REDD. He estimates that global deforestation can be halved if climate negotiators provide $10-15 billion per year for REDD projects.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva established the Amazon Fund last year to attract $21 billion in donations from industrialized nations. The donations support efforts to reduce deforestation rates 70 percent by 2018 through greater enforcement of logging restrictions and land-title reform.

Norway has offered $1 billion to the fund, and Brazilian leaders say other European nations have expressed interest in contributing. The fund, however, does not allow donors to receive carbon credits or "rights to emissions" - a likely reason why some nations have been hesitant to participate. Brazil has long been skeptical of any deforestation agreement that may allow industrialized nations to control its Amazon policies.

Stern, who currently teaches at the London School of Economics, said the restrictions should not deter support. "If you can get carbon credit - good. But you should do it anyways," he said.

REST http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009545.html

100 months to Act on Climate, Warns Charles from WorldChanging


Prince Charles

Prince Charles. Photograph: Tim Graham/Getty Images

The Prince of Wales is to issue a warning that the world has only "100 months to act" before the damage caused by global warming becomes irreversible.

As part of a tour of South America, his speech to business leaders in Rio de Janeiro on Thursday will echo predictions made by climate change experts who believe there are about eight years left to cut C02 emissions. He will warn that failure to act urgently could have catastrophic effects for the planet.

The speech will stress the importance of big business joining the fight against global warming. He will say that although the world is in recession, protecting the environment should remain a priority.

It is believed the speech will echo one that he gave in Sรฃo Paulo at the start of the last recession in 1991, when he warned that it was important to continue to care for the welfare of the planet and that it should not become "a luxury".

The prince's tour will help to put the environment at the top of the political agenda before leaders of the G20 nations meet in London next month.

The prince, accompanied by the Duchess of Cornwall, will arrive in Chile tomorrow at the start of a 10-day tour before travelling to Brazil and Ecuador. The tour will end in the Galรกpagos Islands to mark the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.

REST http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009546.html

Opposing Obama's Tax Hike on the Rich, Baucus Proposes To Tax Your Health Care Benefits from Open Left

Remember when reading the following story that Max Baucus calls himself a Democrat, and that the Senate Democratic Caucus inexplicably keeps this man in the chairmanship of the committee overseeing tax and health care policy:

Sen. Max Baucus says he'd prefer funding health care reform by taxing people's health benefits rather than phasing out tax deductions on the richest Americans...President Obama is proposing to phase out income tax deductions for people making more than $250,000 a year. Baucus has told Obama he doesn't like that idea.
Baucus technically represents one of the poorest states in the nation - I say technically, because he's made clear he really represents K Street and the super-rich. This latest declaration makes that abundantly clear.

REST http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=12108

Nancy Reagan: "I'm Very Grateful That President Obama ... " from Daily Kos

FROM http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/3/9/123842/4252/455/706362

Let's see if any conservatives will have the guts to go after Nancy Reagan:

"I'm very grateful that President Obama has lifted the restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research," she wrote in a statement released shortly after Obama signed an executive order lifting the Bush-era restrictions. "These new rules will now make it possible for scientists to move forward. I urge researchers to make use of the opportunities that are available to them, and to do all they can to fulfill the promise that stem cell research offers."

Nancy Reagan has been an outspoken advocate of stem-cell research – and scientists hope that the research could someday lead to cure to Alzheimer's disease, which afflicted her husband, Ronald Reagan.

Reagan continued, "Countless people, suffering from many different diseases, stand to benefit from the answers stem cell research can provide. We owe it to ourselves and to our children to do everything in our power to find cures for these diseases – and soon. As I've said before, time is short, and life is precious."

Come on, Rush, tell us what you really think.

==================================

Vitter Stands By His $249 Million In Earmarks While Complaining That The Omnibus Bill Is 'Bloated'

vitpic.jpgRepublicans like Sens. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), have been attacking the $410 billion omnibus spending bill, claiming that it has too much spending and too many earmarks. One of the loudest voices calling for the bill's defeat has been Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), despite his earmarks worth $249 million for 142 projects.

In an interview on Laura Ingraham's radio show today, Vitter defended himself against charges that his position is hypocritical. "I don't think it's wrong to advocate for specific priorities in your state if it doesn't change your opinion about an overall bill, which I think in this case is way too bloated," said Vitter.

Pressed by Ingraham about whether it was "worth it to put these earmarks in," Vitter said that "the important bottom line" was that he would vote against "a bloated bill, $410 billion":

VITTER: Laura, I understand your argument. I think the important bottom line is when the vote comes, does David Vitter or Murkowski or Bond or anyone else vote for a bloated bill, $410 billion in this case. I can tell you what my answer is going to be. Ever since I've known the size and scope of this bill, I've said that's way out of line. It's 8 percent increase in these areas of the federal government, which is the most since Jimmy Carter.

Listen here:

REST AT http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/09/vitter-earmark-hypocrisy/

=====================================================

Store Accidentally Sells Peppers Stuffed With Cocaine [Party Peppers]

We love chile rellenos, but this is just silly. A store in NYC sold peppers stuffed with cocaine to three different customers, none of whom knew they were getting a little something extra in their produce.

REST http://consumerist.com/5166969/store-accidentally-sells-peppers-stuffed-with-cocaine

=====================================================================


Joe Lieberman: Never Mind from Daily Kos

FROM http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/3/9/113032/8566/483/706326

Joe Lieberman, during the presidential campaign:

In my opinion, the choice could not be more clear ... Between one candidate, John McCain, who has always put the country first, worked across party lines to get things done, and one candidate who has not.

Joe Lieberman today:

Lieberman said he never meant to suggest that Obama did not put his country first. Lieberman said his words were "too subject" to that interpretation and that he wishes he had spoken more clearly.

I think he was pretty clear.

Cantor Complains Of Distractions, But He Co-Sponsored Resolution Celebrating The American Dental Association from Think Progress

FROM http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/09/cantor-stem-cells/

Yesterday on CNN, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) strongly criticized President Obama for his expected decision (Obama signed the executive order this afternoon) to reverse the Bush administration's limits on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, claiming that the move is a distraction from the country's economic troubles:

CANTOR: [T]here's a reason why this discussion is coming up this week. Why are we going and distracting ourselves from the economy? This is job number one; let's focus on what needs to be done. […] We've got a new Congress now. And certainly that is something that we ought to be talking about, but let's take care of business first. People are out of jobs. And, again, there is a reason why all this is happening right there — right now.

Watch it:

Except it might be difficult for Cantor to have any credibility in criticizing others for not, as he said, "tak[ing] care of business first." Just in the first few months of the 111th Congress, Cantor has co-sponsored legislation that one might consider "distracting":

H. Res. 204: Congratulating the American Dental Association for its 150th year of working to improve the public's oral health and promoting dentistry.

H. Res. 18: A bill honoring the life, achievements and contributions of Paul Newman.

H.R. 997: To declare English as the official language of the United States.

H.R. 836: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax on beer to its pre-1991 level, and for other purposes.

While the life and work of Paul Newman is certainly something to be celebrated, it seems Cantor doesn't have a leg to stand on when criticizing others for distracting from the real issues.

AIG: Is the Risk Systemic? from The Big Picture

from http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/aig-is-the-risk-systemic/

ABC reports:

An AIG report to the Treasury Department last month warned that if the government didn't come to its rescue again, its collapse would trigger a "chain reaction of enormous proportions" that would "bankrupt the entire system" and make it impossible for AIG to repay the billions it already owed the U.S. government. Four days later, AIG was given $30 billion in federal aid on top of the $130 billion it had already received . . .

The draft, obtained by ABC News, was marked "strictly confidential." It said, "The failure of AIG would cause turmoil in the U.S. economy and global markets and have multiple and potentially catastrophic unforeseen consequences."

As I wrote in Bailout Nation, almost everytime we hear the phrase "Systemic Risk," we get our pockets picked.  Systemic risk has become a buzzword — just the latest scare tactic. It is astonishing.

Full report below . . .

>

Aig Systemic 090309

Beck: Stem-cell research will lead directly to the search for a new ‘master race.’ from Think Progress


On his radio show today, conservative talker Glenn Beck commented on President Obama overturning the ban on federally funded stem-cell research. Beck argued that funding stem-cell research would lead directly to a search for a new "master race," the revival of Eugenics, and the reincarnation of the Nazi's "final solution." Believing that Obama's success as president would hasten the arrival of his conspiracy theory, Beck then declared, "I hope Barack Obama fails":

BECK: So here you have Barack Obama going in and spending the money on embryonic stem cell research, and then some, fundamentally changing – remember, those great progressive doctors are the ones who brought us Eugenics. It was the progressive movement and it science. Let's put science truly in her place. If evolution is right, why don't we just help out evolution? That was the idea. And sane people agreed with it!

And it was from America. Progressive movement in America. Eugenics. In case you don't know what Eugenics led us to: the Final Solution. A master race! A perfect person. …. The stuff that we are facing is absolutely frightening. So I guess I have to put my name on yes, I hope Barack Obama fails. But I just want his policies to fail; I want America to wake up.

rest http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/09/beck-eugenics/

Obama's stem-cell research order means the Republican Dark Ages are finally over from Crooks and Liars


Obama-StemCells_03-09-09
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play

The War on Science is finally over. Science won.

The key to Obama's executive order lifting limits on federal funding for stem-cell research, which he signed this morning:

This Order is an important step in advancing the cause of science in America. But let's be clear: promoting science isn't just about providing resources – it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient – especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda – and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.

By doing this, we will ensure America's continued global leadership in scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs. That is essential not only for our economic prosperity, but for the progress of all humanity.

This is part of Obama's broader vision of how government engages with science, as the WaPo's Rob Stein reported this morning. It's an approach that has drawn the approval of traditional conservatives like Nancy Reagan.

rest http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/obamas-stem-cell-research-order-mean

Rove: Bush Was Not One Of The Three Officials Who ‘Unanimously’ Decided To Bail Out Banks from Think Progress

from http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/09/rove-bush-absent-on-bailout/

On Fox News this afternoon, Karl Rove insisted that "this crew" in the White House has caused the collapse of the market, faulting the Obama administration for the economic crisis. He blamed Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in particular, saying Geithner could not point fingers at the previous administration because he was one of the three people who made the decision to bail out the banks in the first place, with last fall's TARP.

In fact, Rove declared that only three people made the decision about the bank bailout — and none of them were then-President Bush:

Look, Geithner was sitting in the room, last year. Three people made the decision about the bank rescue package: Geithner, Ben Bernanke, and Hank Paulson, the Treasury Secretary.

Rove added that those three "unanimously made those decisions about the bank rescue." Apparently they simply informed then-President Bush of their decision to give $700 billion to banks after the fact. Watch it:

Ironically, during the same interview, Rove declared that the Obama administration has "got to start accepting responsibility for the outcome of their decisions" — seconds before suggesting that Bush didn't even play a role in one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency.

Apparently Bush wasn't really "the decider" after all.

Boehner Still Touting Spending Freeze and Republican Alternatives on Budget Nonsense from Crooks and Liars


FTN-Boehner-Spending-Freeze-030809
icon Download | Play   icon Download | Play

John Boehner thinks America has forgotten about the last eight years if we're supposed to believe that he cares one iota about fiscal responsibility. On Face the Nation John Boehner continues to hammer on their disasterous request for a spending freeze.

Even David Brooks called this out for what it is, insanity.

CongressMatters has more here on another of Boehner's B.S. on the Republican having any plans for job creation: "Twice as Many Jobs at Half the Cost" - Mythbusting Republican Spin.

But, just for the record, they didn't really offer anything. And there is absolutely no credible data to support that claim a republican alternative would have created twice as many jobs at half the cost. Just like there was never $30 million for any Pelosi's mouse. Just like the stimulus bill doesn't have provisions designed to kill bible study programs.

It's a wonder Boehner, Cantor and the rest of the GOP leadership doesn't have whiplash from the constant spinning.

rest http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/boehner-still-touting-spending-freeze-republican-alternatives